X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:31:58 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-4831462@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET>
Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.5] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2a)
  with ESMTP id 4831441 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:56:13 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.173.5; envelope-from=N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET
Received: from new-host.home ([unknown] [71.184.232.51])
 by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net
 (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009))
 with ESMTPA id <0LFU00BKYC46Z8LN@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for
 lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 08:55:19 -0600 (CST)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Subject: Re: Water based Paint
From: "Greenbacks, UnLtd." <N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET>
In-reply-to: <list-4831333@logan.com>
X-Original-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:55:18 -0500
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-Original-Message-id: <1C99F3F5-33A8-4CBC-85E1-F5CE233BDA42@VERIZON.NET>
References: <list-4831333@logan.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)

It's crunch time for choosing a base coat/clear coat system for my 360. =
Primers used so far are UV Smooth Prime followed by PPG DP and K-36. I'd =
like to at least consider a water based system. Anyone here have =
personal experience with water based paint? Pros, cons, differences? Any =
feedback would be most helpful.

Thanks,

Angier Ames
N4ZQ=