X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 23:36:33 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-4831132@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <troneill@charter.net>
Received: from mta21.charter.net ([216.33.127.81] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2a)
  with ESMTP id 4829813 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:19:57 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.33.127.81; envelope-from=troneill@charter.net
Received: from imp09 ([10.20.200.9]) by mta21.charter.net
          (InterMail vM.7.09.02.04 201-2219-117-106-20090629) with ESMTP
          id <20110128191921.DMBB3705.mta21.charter.net@imp09>
          for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:19:21 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([75.132.241.174])
	by imp09 with smtp.charter.net
	id 17KM1g0093mUFT7057KMG5; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:19:21 -0500
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=pGjBQ1ASaFthicI9UhEA:9
 a=evyBZwupST0rRF6UkMQojuearbUA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
From: Terrence O'Neill <troneill@charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: wing slosh thinning
X-Original-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:19:21 -0600
X-Original-Message-Id: <FBB21172-B414-453A-996F-ACD67285217F@charter.net>
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)

Has anyone had the dubious pleasure of sloshing a wing tank with =
PR-1005-L?
How about thinning the fluid, say, 20% with MEK, and then re-coating =
with a second slosh?
The tech data and especially application suggestions are  scanty... such =
as -- they don't want to say how much PR-1005-L sealant fluid is needed =
to slosh a how many gallons capacity tank. =20

Shared experience would be deeply appreciated.
Thanks,

Terrence N211AL
L235/320