X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:32:23 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-da03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.145] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c1) with ESMTP id 4791842 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:51:00 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.145; envelope-from=RWolf99@aol.com Received: from imo-ma01.mx.aol.com (imo-ma01.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.136]) by imr-da03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p0JKoKIX003136 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:50:20 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-ma01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.f22.cfd774c (55834) for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:50:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtprly-ma02.mx.aol.com (smtprly-ma02.mx.aol.com [64.12.207.141]) by cia-md06.mx.aol.com (v129.7) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD062-5c4b4d374e8613e; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:50:17 -0500 Received: from webmail-d062 (webmail-d062.sim.aol.com [205.188.91.211]) by smtprly-ma02.mx.aol.com (v129.5) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMA021-5c4b4d374e8613e; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:50:14 -0500 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: Lithium Batteries X-Original-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:50:14 -0500 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-AOL-IP: 97.115.230.25 X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: rwolf99@aol.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CD86319B0C546E_1BB8_2519_webmail-d062.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33124-STANDARD Received: from 97.115.230.25 by webmail-d062.sysops.aol.com (205.188.91.211) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:50:14 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CD86319B09F30D-1BB8-E90@webmail-d062.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: RWolf99@aol.com ----------MB_8CD86319B0C546E_1BB8_2519_webmail-d062.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Concerning home-packaged lithium batteries, Hamid wrote: <> I have to agree with Hamid here. I spent a very long two years as a batte= ry engineer in the mid 1990's and learned a bunch of stuff. Among these= was the requirement to balance the individual cells during the recharging= process (which happens at the beginning of every flight, right after you= start the engine). Screwing it up results in overcharging some cells and= undercharging others. Lead acid is rather robust in this regard, as it= turns out, but lithium is another story. In fact, the R/C model guys cha= rge each cell individually and discharge them in series. (They also do th= is in fireproof bags, but that's the more twitchy Li-Po chemistry). I thi= nk it's the overcharging of an individual cell that results in fires, but= excessively rapid discharge could also do it, I suppose. (Maybe due to= a short in the packaging???) WARNING! I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT MODERN BATTERIES! But I do know that lithiu= m batteries can catch fire and lead acid batteries don't. So I'd be reluc= tant to take a chance here -- let the professional research lab do it. =20 I also understand that this technological reticence is why I installed a= 1940's Lycoming in my 360. Modern stuff is generally better but we each= draw the safety / efficiency / experimental line in different places, I= suppose. - Rob Wolf ----------MB_8CD86319B0C546E_1BB8_2519_webmail-d062.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Concerning home-packaged lithium batteries, Hamid wrote:
 
<<You can not just take a bunch of= cells and put them in series/parallel to make a pack and put it in your= airplane to replace the lead acid battery. You need to charge balance the= pack and pay attention to the charging voltage and over-charge/over-disch= arge. Better to pay some reliable company to do the integration and testin= g than do it yourself and risk an in-flight fire. The $100 you saved by do= ing it yourself will feel the most expensive $100 in your wallet as you ar= e dealing with an in-flight fire.>>
 
I have to agree with Hamid here.  I spent a very long two years= as a battery engineer in the mid 1990's and learned a bunch of stuff.&nbs= p; Among these was the requirement to balance the individual cells during= the recharging process (which happens at the beginning of every flight,= right after you start the engine).  Screwing it up results in overch= arging some cells and undercharging others.  Lead acid is rather robu= st in this regard, as it turns out, but lithium is another story.  In= fact, the R/C model guys charge each cell individually and discharge them= in series.  (They also do this in fireproof bags, but that's the mor= e twitchy Li-Po chemistry).  I think it's the overcharging of an indi= vidual cell that results in fires, but excessively rapid discharge could= also do it, I suppose.  (Maybe due to a short in the packaging???)
 
WARNING! I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT MODERN BATTERIES!  But I do know= that lithium batteries can catch fire and lead acid batteries don't. = ; So I'd be reluctant to take a chance here -- let the professional resear= ch lab do it.  
 
I also understand that this technological reticence is why I ins= talled a 1940's Lycoming in my 360.  Modern stuff is generally better= but we each draw the safety / efficiency / experimental line in different= places, I suppose.
 
- Rob Wolf

----------MB_8CD86319B0C546E_1BB8_2519_webmail-d062.sysops.aol.com--