Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #56486
From: <N66mg@aol.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Questions - Performance Engines Perfidity
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:11:15 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
 
I can't believe that anyone would deal with Performance Engines. Here in California we probably the one of best engine rebuilders in Visalia, CA. LyCon Engines!  They stand by their engines and built most of the engines that are used in air racing  Red Bull and etc.  Performance was so rude, why even bother with them at all.
Michael
Glasair n66mg &  90% L-IV 7sz
 
 
In a message dated 10/22/2010 8:18:25 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, frederickmoreno@bigpond.com writes:

John Barrett is out of country and asked me to forward his post below.   Fred

 

As owner of a TSIO 550 engine sold as new/experimental, I have been following this discussion with growing concern.  I was involved with a group of three customers including Fred M. who negotiated with Monson and ordered engines simultaneously. I have not had first flight yet although I have run the engine on the aircraft enough to dial it in for first flight.

 

 Some questions and thoughts come to mind:

1. Since the rush to purchase Performance Engines products was fueled by testimonials on the LML from one or more participants in the races at Reno, what can these owners tell us about their experiences with PE products in the intervening time since those testimonials?

 

2. Are there PE customers out there who are satisfied with their engines?  What maintenance issues have surfaced for them and how many hours have they got on theirs?

 

3. As owners of PE engines that have not (yet?) had problems, what should we do to minimize risk to life and limb?  Should we treat this as if it were an AD note for complete tear down, or is there some less painful alternative at this point? 



John Barrett 

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster