X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:21:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.8) with ESMTP id 4416828 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 09:14:03 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=71.74.56.123; envelope-from=Wolfgang@MiCom.net X-Original-Return-Path: X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=rsPCLZWyMDYHS6UYEmJ4E6URGqccNA0A37lrbq4bmic= c=1 sm=0 a=MHZY6FYWMEQOp7S43i2QIw==:17 a=3oc9M9_CAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=CjxXgO3LAAAA:8 a=0JRh5ITCdRx00m_YNH8A:9 a=DvZqg7LouDIJ3QSae70A:7 a=AW8lQdoQpbMp538sAWVQgWyeE9wA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=2LhK3hNzeYwA:10 a=uYU9d8CF8LYA:10 a=wCpWlxsqoGQA:10 a=oiiIaz2L7x4A:10 a=CVU0O5Kb7MsA:10 a=U8Ie8EnqySEA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=rC2wZJ5BpNYA:10 a=i9zYC9e5kSZfdrXVMYMA:9 a=ROjWNhHO9jiRwVPuWBYA:7 a=I0zj_WmQb-11KFAkMzVwksoXcVMA:4 a=MHZY6FYWMEQOp7S43i2QIw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.218.201.50 Received: from [74.218.201.50] ([74.218.201.50:1698] helo=Lobo) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id EB/74-03848-7F5185C4; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:13:28 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <000901cb330d$a6b2fad0$6401a8c0@Lobo> From: "Wolfgang" X-Original-To: Subject: Re: [LML] flap coupling X-Original-Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 09:13:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01CB32EC.1F65B160" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CB32EC.1F65B160 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have looked at that and adding a plate to the bellcrank at the end of = the flap actuator in the 320/360 can give an attachment point for the = coupling spring right next to the elevator push rod. Wolfgnag -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- From: Sky2high@aol.com=20 Sender: =20 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: flap coupling=20 Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:58:27 -0400=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 =20 =20 You will need a bit more design in the 320/360 as the flap = actuators operate approximately 90 degrees to the elevator push rod = whereas the 235 flap mechanism is a torque tube with any attached arm = acting parallel to the elevator push rod. Grayhawk In a message dated 8/3/2010 6:39:35 A.M. Central Daylight Time, = n103md@yahoo.com writes: Paul Lipps has used a spring connection between the flap = actuator and the elevator pushrod to drastically reduce the trim disturbance felt when changing = flap settings. http://lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/Message/44556.html I copied his installation, and after a few adjustments to spring = rates and engagement point, I have to make only small trim adjustments after lowering = or raising the flaps. http://lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/Message/42607.html Previously, the full range of adjustment on the mechanical = spring trim was not quite enough to cover the full range of operating speeds. The installation is = very simple, consisting of a spring mounted in the center console. One end is attached to the = end of the flap actuator piston (in a 235). The other end of the spring is attached to = the elevator pushrod. Other messages in the thread: http://lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/Message/42620.html http://lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/Message/42654.html -bob -- For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CB32EC.1F65B160 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have looked at that and adding a = plate to the=20 bellcrank at the end of the flap actuator in the 320/360 can give an = attachment=20 point for the coupling spring right next to the elevator push = rod.
 
Wolfgnag
lml@lancaironline.net
From: Sky2high@aol.com
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: flap = coupling
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:58:27 = -0400
To:
You will need a bit more design in the 320/360 as the flap = actuators=20 operate approximately 90 degrees to the elevator push rod whereas = the 235=20 flap mechanism is a torque tube with any attached arm acting = parallel to=20 the elevator push rod.
 
Grayhawk
 
In a message dated 8/3/2010 6:39:35 A.M. Central Daylight = Time,=20 n103md@yahoo.com writes:
Paul Lipps = has used a=20 spring connection between the flap actuator and
the elevator=20 pushrod
to drastically reduce the trim disturbance felt when = changing=20 flap=20 = settings.
http://lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/Message/44556.html
=
I=20 copied his installation, and after a few adjustments to spring=20 rates
and engagement
point, I have to make only small trim = adjustments after lowering or
raising the=20 = flaps.
http://lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/Message/42607.html
Previously,=20 the full range of adjustment on the mechanical spring = trim
was not=20 quite enough
to cover the full range of operating speeds. The = installation is very
simple, consisting of a
spring = mounted in the=20 center console. One end is attached to the end
of the flap=20 actuator
piston (in a 235). The other end of the spring is = attached=20 to the
elevator pushrod.

Other messages in the=20 = thread:
http://lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/Message/42620.html
ht= tp://lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/Message/42654.html

-bob
--
For=20 archives and unsub=20 = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CB32EC.1F65B160--