X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:45:55 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.8) with ESMTP id 4415064 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:37:32 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=71.74.56.124; envelope-from=Wolfgang@MiCom.net X-Original-Return-Path: X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=UNsZTQkGB7107t9t/+sxm7Q+EZej4XQwr732X2AxBCc= c=1 sm=0 a=MHZY6FYWMEQOp7S43i2QIw==:17 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=dm479_xrMJ9mNmPij-oA:9 a=Nqd7koC0jPZz10H1QKIy1CzX9WgA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=69EAbJreAAAA:8 a=9RTqLXRJgL_yFdOjn3YA:9 a=24-NQ4XUDbMp98deggsA:7 a=wwservCSJPDegJzbePaAPfuvoUIA:4 a=EfJqPEOeqlMA:10 a=MHZY6FYWMEQOp7S43i2QIw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.218.201.50 Received: from [74.218.201.50] ([74.218.201.50:1199] helo=Lobo) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id F0/84-18389-808D65C4; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:36:56 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <00b901cb3250$26677d00$6401a8c0@Lobo> From: "Wolfgang" X-Original-To: Subject: Fw: [LML] flap coupling X-Original-Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:36:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B6_01CB322E.9F17C290" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01CB322E.9F17C290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To reduce the adverse pitch coupling when you drop the flaps, of course. Wolfgang ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bill Kennedy=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 9:42 PM Subject: RE: [LML] flap coupling "Has anyone thought about a spring coupling from the flap actuator th = the elevator push rod?"=20 Not me. Why do it? ------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01CB322E.9F17C290 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To reduce the adverse pitch coupling when you = drop the=20 flaps, of course.
 
Wolfgang
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Bill=20 Kennedy
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 9:42 PM
Subject: RE: [LML] flap coupling

"Has anyone=20 thought about a spring coupling from the flap actuator th the elevator = push=20 rod?"

Not me. Why do it? ------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01CB322E.9F17C290--