X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:45:49 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.40] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.8) with ESMTP id 4410284 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:05:51 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.206.40; envelope-from=cfi@instructor.net Received: from imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (imo-ma02.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.137]) by imr-ma02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o6T0502v032054 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:05:00 -0400 Received: from cfi@instructor.net by imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.d9b.109b9bcc (45450) for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:04:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-de02.mx.aol.com (smtprly-de02.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.169]) by cia-mc05.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMC058-b23f4c50c5a43a7; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:04:56 -0400 Received: from web-mmc-m06 (web-mmc-m06.sim.aol.com [64.12.224.139]) by smtprly-de02.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDE028-b23f4c50c5a43a7; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:04:52 -0400 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Welcome to Spokane X-Original-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:04:52 -0400 X-AOL-IP: 72.40.60.15 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: cfi@instructor.net X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CCFCC8CD62C620_1894_C6E9_web-mmc-m06.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: Mail.com Webmail 32360-STANDARD Received: from 72.40.60.15 by web-mmc-m06.sysops.aol.com (64.12.224.139) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:04:52 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CCFCC8CD489700-1894-6250@web-mmc-m06.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: cfi@instructor.net ----------MB_8CCFCC8CD62C620_1894_C6E9_web-mmc-m06.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Dave, You can't leave us hanging like that. What happened? Was the tug mo= ving, the airplane moving or what? Ron =20 =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: David Standish To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Wed, Jul 28, 2010 7:57 pm Subject: [LML] Welcome to Spokane Propeller Vs. tug. Tug wins!=20 =20 Time since new 260 hours. Propeller repair/over haul starting at around= $2,000 could be very much higher. Engine tear down inspection and mandat= ory replacement parts starting at $10,000 could be very much higher not co= unting removal and re installation and shipping. Down time 4 weeks minimu= m. No lawyers involved, yet.=20 =20 David Standish=20 N32CL=20 =20 -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l =20 ----------MB_8CCFCC8CD62C620_1894_C6E9_web-mmc-m06.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Dave,
   You can't leave us hanging like that.   What happen= ed?   Was the tug moving, the airplane moving or what?

Ron




Propeller Vs. tug. Tug wins! 
 
Time since new 260 hours. Propeller repair/over haul starting at around= =20 $2,000 could be very much higher. Engine tear down inspection and=20 mandatory replacement parts starting at $10,000 could be very much=20 higher not counting removal and re installation and shipping. Down time= =20 4 weeks minimum. No lawyers involved, yet. 
 
David Standish 
N32CL 

----------MB_8CCFCC8CD62C620_1894_C6E9_web-mmc-m06.sysops.aol.com--