Return-Path: Received: from scratchy.itsnet.com ([192.41.96.2]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA1141 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 1998 10:38:02 -0400 Received: from scottdah (91-218.dialup.itsnet.com [192.41.91.218]) by scratchy.itsnet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA03647 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 1998 08:37:52 -0600 (MDT) From: "Scott Dahlgren" To: "___Lancair list" Subject: forward canopy Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 08:41:02 -0600 Message-ID: <000b01bde249$31a79c40$da5b29c0@scottdah> Importance: Normal X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ed de Chazal, I installed the longeron mounted hinge on my 320 canopy. it has some pro's and cons: Pros: -it is cheaper to build- I would use 3/8" plate and drill lightening holes with a uni-bit just to make it more rigid if you go with it. Maybe even reduce the pattern 30-50% (for rigidity). you can get nice, light, gas lifts from Volvo 700 trunks or hatches. very high quality. -it works with the lancair door system. -I feel better with it not attached to the gas tank. I am concerned about accident or high wind damage. -I don't think it needs any beefing up at the longeron area. and the installation is almost as light as the Parallel Arm Canopy Cons: -the kinematics are a bit funny since the hinge line is lower. I had two choices; no pre lift, or prelift which stuck the lip of my canopy into the wind (does the factory mod do this?) -engineering time; I added 20-30 hours of engineering to my project and made several configurations before I got it to work. the location of the hinge point, its run and its relation to the gas lift are critical. I will post a picture if you are considering building it that way. good luck Scott Dahlgren