X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:13:06 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.40] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.7) with ESMTP id 4325695 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:21:21 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.206.40; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from imo-da04.mx.aol.com (imo-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.202]) by imr-ma02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o4PHKZGC028943 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:20:35 -0400 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-da04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.ce6.5ed10fc5 (34958) for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:20:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from magic-d24.mail.aol.com (magic-d24.mail.aol.com [172.19.146.158]) by cia-da06.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIADA067-888e4bfc06dd34f; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:20:29 -0400 From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1a021.61521722.392d60dd@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:20:29 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] 320/360 tail mod X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1a021.61521722.392d60dd_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.5 sub 155 X-AOL-ORIG-IP: 205.188.70.69 X-AOL-IP: 172.19.146.158 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: Sky2high@aol.com --part1_1a021.61521722.392d60dd_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Danny, BS. If you are within 250 NM of KARR, drop me a line and we can arrange a ride for you in my small tailed 320 (N92EX) ....... Scott Krueger _Sky2high@aol.com_ (mailto:Sky2high@aol.com) In a message dated 5/25/2010 11:28:07 A.M. Central Daylight Time, dannymiller@wowway.com writes: Hi folks, I'm new here and I have no doubts this has been discussed at length in the past. I'm considering the purchase of a 320 with the original tail and from everything I've read it seems to be a squirrely a/c subject to PIO in the landing configuration. Can you direct me to additional resources that describe the time/effort/expense, etc. involved in retrofitting the tail section? Thanks, Danny -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html --part1_1a021.61521722.392d60dd_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Danny,
 
BS.
 
If you are within 250 NM of KARR, drop me a line and we can arrange= a ride=20 for you in my small tailed 320 (N92EX) .......
 
Scott Krueger
 
 
In a message dated 5/25/2010 11:28:07 A.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 dannymiller@wowway.com writes:
Hi=20 folks, I'm new here and I have no doubts this has been discussed at
l= ength=20 in the past.  I'm considering the purchase of a 320 with the=20 original
tail and from everything I've read it seems to be a squirrel= y a/c=20 subject to
PIO in the landing configuration.  Can you direct me= to=20 additional resources
that describe the time/effort/expense, etc. invo= lved=20 in retrofitting the
tail=20 section?

Thanks,
Danny


--
For archives and unsub= =20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
--part1_1a021.61521722.392d60dd_boundary--