X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:45:10 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-mb02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.207.163] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.4) with ESMTP id 4175734 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:27:28 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.207.163; envelope-from=LenS790501@aol.com Received: from imo-da01.mx.aol.com (imo-da01.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.199]) by imr-mb02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o2NDQexx030292 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:26:40 -0400 Received: from LenS790501@aol.com by imo-da01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.bbf.6d195ff8 (45450) for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from magic-d17.mail.aol.com (magic-d17.mail.aol.com [172.19.155.133]) by cia-mc05.mx.aol.com (v127_r1.2) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMC058-b18a4ba8c18b3d2; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:26:35 -0400 From: LenS790501@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <38a45.50f020eb.38da1b8b@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:26:35 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Prop for LNC2 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_38a45.50f020eb.38da1b8b_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.5 sub 155 X-AOL-ORIG-IP: 174.18.197.252 X-AOL-IP: 172.19.155.133 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: LenS790501@aol.com --part1_38a45.50f020eb.38da1b8b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Craig, I'm running an MT constant speed 3 blade on my IO360 and it performs well. I had to have the seals replaced last year but they are still holding. Len Spina In a message dated 3/23/2010 3:07:04 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, marv@lancair.net writes: Posted for "Craig Schulze" : Hi Guys, Does anyone have any feedback on different props for the Lancair 320/360? Has anyone tried a Hartzel Scimitar? MT? Any performance differences over the standard Hartzel 2 blade? Thank you, Craig Schulze Lancair 320 -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html --part1_38a45.50f020eb.38da1b8b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Craig,

I'm running an MT constant speed 3 blade on my IO360 and it performs= well.=20 I had to have the seals replaced last year but they are still holding.

Len Spina

In a message dated 3/23/2010 3:07:04 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,= =20 marv@lancair.net writes:

Posted for "Craig Schulze"=20 <craig@skybolt.net>:

Hi Guys,

Does anyon= e have=20 any feedback on different props for the Lancair 320/360?
Has an= yone=20 tried a Hartzel Scimitar? MT? Any performance=20 differences over
the standard Hartzel 2=20 blade?

Thank you,

Craig=20 Schulze

Lancair 320

-- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l

--part1_38a45.50f020eb.38da1b8b_boundary--