Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:24:12 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-4174783@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.65; envelope-from=panelmaker@earthlink.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
  b=I6NEYv4OqC6OCTzhbllqFCxc5/aUjy8piBAMk5hVj167t58PEPieNx9YRY6GG4sG;
  h=Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
From: "Jim Nordin" <panelmaker@earthlink.net>
References: <list-4173957@logan.com>
Subject:  Lancair 235
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AcrJYNKNaAqmo+J7SO+lZKrVJ5BU0AAeRs+w
In-Reply-To: <list-4173957@logan.com>

Say Lorn,
In your matrix (LancairCostSpec.jpg) you show speed and gph. For these
figures, were all aircraft operated at the same rpm & manifold pressure? Or
percent horsepower?
Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Lorn
H Olsen
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 8:41 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair 235

Gus,

You ask if it flies as well as it looks. What are you looking at? The Legacy
looks almost the same and yet cruises at 240 kts. Why not a Legacy? The
answer is pretty simple, money. Not only the initial cost but the cost of
operation. I think that, depending on your size, the 235 is a great flying
aircraft.

Here is an unofficial table of about what the different Lancairs cost (used,
built), how they operate, and the direct operational cost: