Lorn,
Quick question:  why is the 320 some 15 knots faster than the 235 w/ 320 engine with less wetted area (slightly smaller fuselage)?
Terrence (w/ 235 w/ 320 engine) N211AL

On Mar 21, 2010, at 8:41 PM, Lorn H Olsen wrote:

> Gus,
>
> You ask if it flies as well as it looks. What are you looking at? The Legacy looks almost the same and yet cruises at 240 kts. Why not a Legacy? The answer is pretty simple, money. Not only the initial cost but the cost of operation. I think that, depending on your size, the 235 is a great flying aircraft.
>
> Here is an unofficial table of about what the different Lancairs cost (used, built), how they operate, and the direct operational cost:
>
> <LancairCostSpec.jpg>
>
> <Lancair Cost Specs.xls>
>
> These numbers are from my own from experience. They do show some interesting facts. Followup comments are more than welcome.
>
> Lorn
>
> On Mar 21, 2010, at 6:00 AM, Lancair Mailing List wrote:
>
>> rom: marv@lancair.net
>> Date: March 20, 2010 3:34:11 PM EDT
>>
>> Posted for Gus Virginis <gvirginis0819@me.com>:
>>
>> I am negotiating on the purchase of a 235 built in early 1991. Does the
>> airplane fly as well as it looks? Not sure how old this address is but any
>> information will be appreciated..  Thanks, GUS>>>>>>>>>
> --
> Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, ASMEL, ASES, Comm, Inst
> DynaComm, Corp., 248-345-0500, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.us
> LNC2, FB90/92, O-320-D1F, 1,700 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan
>
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html