X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [71.42.21.121] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.3c3) with HTTP id 4025645 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:09:05 -0500 From: marv@lancair.net Subject: Re: Intumescent firwall coating To: X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.3c3 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:09:05 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5438A26F86154120AA38E08879BE8156@DELL8300> References: <5438A26F86154120AA38E08879BE8156@DELL8300> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Posted for "Jim Nordin" <panelmaker@earthlink.net>:

 Make sure I have this right . the intumescent coating replaces the blanket?
 How about replacing the stainless/fiberfrax on a 360? What else?
 
 And you wouldn't have to put up with compressing the blanket material under
 the mount pads. Yes? Brilliant.
 Jim
 

[Yep, you've got the general idea.  This completely replaces traditional firewall treatments.  And, as shown in the several photos I sent along yesterday, you fill the minor imperfections that remain after application with micro, then paint to match your airframe.  Like any body work, the better the substrate the better the finish.  (The bluish cast in my photos yesterday was caused by white balance issues and an incredibly blue sky just outside the hangar door where the photos were taken.... think WHITE, not light blue <g>.)  We recommend that the coating be applied to about a 3/16" thickness... it does compress slightly under the mounts so some people actually bond in a stainless steel area washer at each hard point and expose it just under the mount by removing the coating there before it hardens.  Like anything else, this stuff does have one minor down-side... its catalyst has a really bad smelll.  Great ventilation and a good respirator are required during application.    <Marv>    ]

 
  _____  
 
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of
 marv@lancair.net
 Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 2:45 PM
 To: lml@lancaironline.net
 Subject: [LML] Intumescent firwall coating
 
 
 
 I just noticed the post that Joe Trepicone sent through regarding our
 intumescent firewall coating. What he said about it is true, it does look
 very nice and it's very effective. My understanding is that it was actually
 developed to protect living and office areas on offshore oil rigs.  It works
 well enough that it has begun to be used in many more applications.   I've
 attached a couple photos of a typical Propjet firewall treated with the
 stuff.  As you can see, it's lots nicer than a blanker <G>.  A typical
 Propjet firewall consumes about 3 gallons, at a cost of $395 / 2gal kit +
 $210 / 1-gal kit, plus freight from Deland, FL.  A standard IVP or LEgacyu
 firewall would probably only use a single 2 gallon kit, as neither has the
 plug to contend with.  Anyone interested please contact me during business
 hours at 386-295-9279 or drop me an email.
 
  <Marv>