X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:41:11 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.61] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with ESMTP id 4020885 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:24:01 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.61; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=fGmawRLBnoteTr/f7uticWGYG+GcWcHrNmS13RavBB2IdLkcOAfXoaqY11+Xwg+o; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [216.57.118.33] (helo=ccaselt3) by elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NKOwW-0004Mq-FX for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:23:24 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <95CB90CC3EB649A3A014513D9B67FA5D@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Tone on list X-Original-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:23:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03A6_01CA7D14.6E6D3870" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da94079fc222855649db299bcab1507745760350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 216.57.118.33 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_03A6_01CA7D14.6E6D3870 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I agree with Jim mostly but I think freedom cuts both ways. person a says: I have done a certain thing. (asserts his freedom to = do a certain thing) person b says: I have decided a) not to do the certain thing b) that my = doing the certain thing impacts the freedoms of others so I don't and c) = I prefer not to fly with people that do the certain thing and may even = say d) I prefer that people that do certain thing are not part of my = insurance pool. (asserts freedoms (a) through (d) and points out some interconnections = in the community) People that are interested in defending freedom should not be offended = in the freedom's asserted by (b). ------=_NextPart_000_03A6_01CA7D14.6E6D3870 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I agree with Jim mostly but I think freedom cuts = both=20 ways.

person a says: I have done a certain=20 thing. (asserts his freedom to do a certain=20 thing)

person b says: I have decided a) not to do the = certain=20 thing b) that my doing the certain thing impacts the freedoms of others = so I=20 don't and c) I prefer not to fly with people that do the certain thing=20 and may even say d) I prefer that people that do certain thing are = not part=20 of my insurance pool.

(asserts freedoms (a) through (d) and = points=20 out some interconnections in the community)

People that are interested in defending freedom = should not=20 be offended in the freedom's asserted by (b).

------=_NextPart_000_03A6_01CA7D14.6E6D3870--