Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #53771
From: Jeremy Fisher <jffisher@gmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Airframe Parachute
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:25:34 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Rob,

The NTSB reports do not seem to support your conclusions.  As I read the first one, although the Cirrus web site says otherwise, the pilot was the one who opened the chute in Jamaica, not the passenger, and it was because of an unspecified engine problem.  In the other case you quoted, the pilot stalled in IMC and entered a spin at low level.  That sounds like a pretty good reason for deploying the chute to me.

I personally think that the airframe chute is a potential life saver in many situations where there are few alternatives, especially for less experienced pilots.  If it is designed into the airplane from the outset, I suspect that the performance penalty will not be that great.

Jerry

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Rob Logan <Rob@logan.com> wrote:

I just don't get it... why someone would deploy a parachute over
a plowed field or if the door is open.. the parachute weight in
fuel is offers soooo many more options. Alittle rain in
the door is much less of a shock then the 4's door blowing
its seal...

http://www.cirruspilots.org/content/2009CAPSWorks.aspx

sorry, vent mode off.

                       Rob

--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster