X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:21:35 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3687758 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:11:58 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=WN5lblnIAK6o7fbtiO2sYvl2/i0AQeei8KvTH4G4EapVh0AdBYVUKlBDsDteaXnC; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [216.57.118.63] (helo=ccaselt3) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MHUVf-0005Wl-RB for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:11:24 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <008e01c9f08b$a078ee10$278c020a@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Vernier throttle and mixture X-Original-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:11:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008B_01C9F06A.18EB8E60" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da9406513cd2e5dd2b80a360938b773178969350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 216.57.118.63 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_008B_01C9F06A.18EB8E60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable one down side would be that you have to hold your thumb on the button of = a vernier if you are making a more than vernier change.....and that is = awkward relative to just grabbing the whole handle and moving it where = you want it. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Dan Reagan=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:28 PM Subject: [LML] Vernier throttle and mixture From what I can tell, Lancair typically sells vernier mixture and prop = control cables but sells friction lock cables for throttle. Why not use = a vernier control for the throttle? Is there a down side to this other = than cost?=20 Thanks, Dan Reagan IVP 650 hours ------=_NextPart_000_008B_01C9F06A.18EB8E60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
one down side would be that you have to = hold your=20 thumb on the button of a vernier if you are making a more than vernier=20 change.....and that is awkward relative to just grabbing the whole = handle and=20 moving it where you want it.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Dan = Reagan
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 = 9:28=20 PM
Subject: [LML] Vernier throttle = and=20 mixture

From what I can tell, Lancair = typically sells=20 vernier mixture and prop control cables but sells friction=20 lock cables for throttle.  Why not use a vernier control for = the=20 throttle?  Is there a down side to this other than=20 cost? 
 
Thanks,
 
Dan Reagan
IVP 650=20 hours
------=_NextPart_000_008B_01C9F06A.18EB8E60--