X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 17:07:48 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms173011pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.11] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3635787 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 08 May 2009 00:15:04 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.173.11; envelope-from=tom.gourley@verizon.net Received: from jacky0da39824a ([71.111.126.146]) by vms173011.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KJB0007S53L8TM4@vms173011.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 07 May 2009 23:14:10 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-Message-id: Reply-to: "Tom Gourley" From: "Tom Gourley" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Performance Engines X-Original-Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 21:14:04 -0700 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15; reply-type=response Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090507-0, 05/07/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean I personally know several builders who have had similar experiences with Performance. Recently, serious threat of legal action has gotten reasonable response out of them. Another tactic that had some success was putting their business phone number on speed dial and then dialing it repeatedly, non-stop until they finally responded. Then doing it again a few days later when they didn't deliver as promised. I guess you have to become a big enough nuisance, or legal threat, to get satisfaction. Tom Gourley