X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 08:00:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from col0-omc3-s8.col0.hotmail.com ([65.55.34.146] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3634140 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 06 May 2009 15:31:26 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.34.146; envelope-from=bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com Received: from COL108-W2 ([65.55.34.135]) by col0-omc3-s8.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 6 May 2009 12:30:51 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_dda8d4dd-c8f0-4eb8-8d78-b1fc34e38e07_" X-Originating-IP: [65.182.246.71] From: Bill Kennedy X-Original-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Baffle kit for Lancair 360 mkII X-Original-Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:30:50 -0700 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2009 19:30:51.0150 (UTC) FILETIME=[2A3CCAE0:01C9CE81] --_dda8d4dd-c8f0-4eb8-8d78-b1fc34e38e07_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think I used the one for the RV-7. It had to be cut down for the much tig= hter cowling=2C but all the holes were ready to go. It was a lot less work = than the Lancair baffling available at that time. The newer RV versions are= better yet. > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Date: Wed=2C 6 May 2009 13:21:10 -0400 > From: dbaleshta@tru.ca > Subject: [LML] Baffle kit for Lancair 360 mkII >=20 > I cannot find a baffle kit on the Lancair parts webpage=2C search doesn't > bring anything up. I understand some folks have used the RV kit? Any > suggestions and if you've used the RV=2C which one? >=20 > Doug >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml --_dda8d4dd-c8f0-4eb8-8d78-b1fc34e38e07_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think I used the one for the RV-7. It had to be cut down for the much tig= hter cowling=2C but all the holes were ready to go. It was a lot less work = than the Lancair baffling available at that time. The newer RV versions are= better yet.

>=3B To: lml@lancaironline.net
>=3B Date: Wed=2C= 6 May 2009 13:21:10 -0400
>=3B From: dbaleshta@tru.ca
>=3B Subje= ct: [LML] Baffle kit for Lancair 360 mkII
>=3B
>=3B I cannot fin= d a baffle kit on the Lancair parts webpage=2C search doesn't
>=3B bri= ng anything up. I understand some folks have used the RV kit? Any
>= =3B suggestions and if you've used the RV=2C which one?
>=3B
>= =3B Doug
>=3B
>=3B
>=3B --
>=3B For archives and unsu= b http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
= --_dda8d4dd-c8f0-4eb8-8d78-b1fc34e38e07_--