X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:45:36 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <2luv2fly@cox.net> Received: from eastrmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.240.47] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with ESMTP id 3597963 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:31:40 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.47; envelope-from=2luv2fly@cox.net Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090427123102.DNOC17104.eastrmmtao105.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:31:02 -0400 Received: from 308h101 ([70.161.126.77]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id kcX21b0051gKBEE02cX2yj; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:31:02 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=m_RHmAHfdePHD9RPhUEA:9 a=lh0Y5KZwNI7LrN1ywB2VNRLF9UcA:4 a=5bD8d7nwRbOUxWrurE4A:9 a=GNxPSTrCOwgZZYUne8MA:7 a=Kom6I6OeNqpL-QTxSwDoRg-xIwkA:4 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-Original-Message-ID: <3158720C4896418FACED47D1ED2A11B7@308h101> From: "Janie & Ed Smith" <2luv2fly@cox.net> X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Insurance X-Original-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:30:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0032_01C9C712.778F2B60" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C9C712.778F2B60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom, I couldn't agree with you more - if everyone on this list was as = accommodating as Charlie, we wouldn't have any problems. Whenever = Charlie speaks - we should listen - - - carefully! Also - - when anyone = needs the services of a DAR, they should choose that DAR very carefully! = Charlie fills the bill - completely! Ed Smith Chesapeake, VA N9JE I agree with Bill completely. Charlie was my DAR, Test pilot, and = instructor on my Lancair IV in 2002. Since then Charlie has been my = recurrent instructor every year and I have found him to extremely = knowledgeable. Charlie is the best instructor I have ever had, and he = has always been very fair from a cost stand point. Tom Byrnes Lancair IV N54TB Bein' kinda hard on ol Charlie there, Bill. Sounds to me like you're = jumping to some very fast conclusions without much thought or evidence. Charlie is, I believe, the most experienced IV DAR on the planet. He = is also one of the most experienced IV pilots/instructors. If you're = looking to build and fly safely, the odds are extremely high that = Charlie can point you in the right direction. I don't see how it can be = anything but a positive to have him involved in the insurance/training = scene. I, for one, appreciate his efforts.=20 Thanks Charlie, let us know what the whole program looks like when = you've got it worked out. Bill Harrelson N5ZQ 320 1,650 hrs N6ZQ IV under construction > Same song second verse.=20 >=20 > Now instead of Lancair controlling who can do the training, we = will have > Charlie Kohler doing it. That means that the flight instructors he = picks > and gets "regionally set" can charge exorbitant fees just like the = situation > now. > The FAA approves flight instructors. What is wrong with that? Part = of the > training the FAA has for flight instructor qualification is = developing a > training syllabus. Is Charlie that much better at that effort? > This whole issue is nuts.=20 >=20 > Bill ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C9C712.778F2B60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tom,
 
I couldn't agree with you more - if everyone on this list was as=20 accommodating as Charlie, we wouldn't have any problems.  Whenever = Charlie=20 speaks - we should listen - - - carefully!  Also - - when anyone = needs the=20 services of a DAR, they should choose that DAR very carefully!  = Charlie=20 fills the bill - completely!
 
Ed Smith
Chesapeake, VA
N9JE
 
I agree with Bill completely.  Charlie was my DAR, Test = pilot, and=20 instructor  on my Lancair IV in 2002.  Since then Charlie = has been=20 my recurrent instructor every year and I have found him to extremely=20 knowledgeable.  Charlie is the best instructor I have ever had, = and he=20 has always been very fair from a cost stand point.
 
Tom Byrnes Lancair IV N54TB
 
 
Bein' kinda hard on ol Charlie = there, Bill.=20 Sounds to me like you're jumping to some very fast conclusions without = much=20 thought or evidence.
Charlie is, I believe, the = most=20 experienced IV DAR on the planet. He is also one of the most=20 experienced IV pilots/instructors. If you're looking to build and = fly=20 safely, the odds are extremely high that Charlie can point you = in the=20 right direction. I don't see how it can be anything but a=20 positive to have him involved in the insurance/training = scene. I,=20 for one, appreciate his efforts.
 
Thanks Charlie, let us know what = the whole=20 program looks like when you've got it worked=20 out.
 
Bill Harrelson
N5ZQ 320 1,650 hrs
N6ZQ  IV under = construction
 
 
 
 
 
 
> Same=20 song second verse.
>
> Now instead of Lancair = controlling who=20 can do the training, we will have
> Charlie Kohler doing it. = That=20 means that the flight instructors he picks
> and gets = "regionally set"=20 can charge exorbitant fees just like the situation
> = now.
> The=20 FAA approves flight instructors. What is wrong with that? Part of=20 the
> training the FAA has for flight instructor qualification = is=20 developing a
> training syllabus. Is Charlie that much better = at that=20 effort?
> This whole issue is nuts.
>
>=20 = Bill

------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C9C712.778F2B60--