Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:45:36 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-3598546@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=70.62.14.124; envelope-from=r.simon@ustek.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Insurance
In-Reply-To: <redirect-3597102@logan.com>
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Insurance
thread-index: AcnHRIOoOqUYg2fiSaC2KH8i1K23eQ==
From: "Lancair" <lancair-esp@ustek.com>

Yes the reduction was for TAA.  Really just equipment common today,
instrument currency and a 20 minute on-line course at AOPA.org.  Heck of
a deal!

Robert=20

-----Original Message-----
From: John Schroeder [mailto:jschroeder@perigee.net]=20
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 9:23 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Insurance

Robert -

Thank goodness.

Was the reduction due to your qualifying for AIG's "Technically Advanced
Airplane" program? We applied for this and ours went down about $700 a
year to $3100 (200K hull). This was also after a prop ding we had
(required a new prop).

Cheers,

JOhn


On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:10:26 -0400, Lancair <lancair-esp@ustek.com>
wrote:

> Seems the industry is treating the IV-P a whole lot different than the

> ES-P.
> Robert M. Simon
> ES-P N301ES