X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:00:43 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d23.mx.aol.com ([205.188.139.137] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with ESMTP id 3597422 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:11:37 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.139.137; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from imo-da04.mx.aol.com (imo-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.202]) by imo-d23.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN1-249f4a3aa183; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:10:50 -0400 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-da04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v40_r1.5.) id q.cb6.4d38cbd8 (37116) for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:10:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-ma03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-ma03.mx.aol.com [64.12.207.142]) by cia-ma01.mx.aol.com (v123.3) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMA012-5c5649f4a3a01da; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:10:48 -0400 Received: from webmail-de02 (webmail-de02.webmail.aol.com [205.188.104.23]) by smtprly-ma03.mx.aol.com (v123.3) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMA034-5c5649f4a3a01da; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:10:40 -0400 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Landing distance for a IVP ? X-Original-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:10:40 -0400 X-AOL-IP: 205.188.169.202 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CB94B171534DE8_1394_61_webmail-de02.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 42679-STANDARD Received: from 75.58.187.84 by webmail-de02.sysops.aol.com (205.188.104.23) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:10:40 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CB94B171239EB8-1394-28@webmail-de02.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO ----------MB_8CB94B171534DE8_1394_61_webmail-de02.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" excellent point Colyn -----Original Message----- From: Colyn Case at earthlink To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 8:23 am Subject: [LML] Re: Landing distance for a IVP ? Another sobering exercise is to look at the airport in question with google earth. You can determine where you would be at 0', 100', 200' 600', 1500' agl and think about where you would go if you lost an engine on/after takeoff. Length of runway is one factor but not the only factor.?? ----------MB_8CB94B171534DE8_1394_61_webmail-de02.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" excellent point Colyn


-----Original Message-----
From: Colyn Case at earthlink <colyncase@earthlink.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 8:23 am
Subject: [LML] Re: Landing distance for a IVP ?

Another sobering exercise is to look at the airport in question with google earth.
You can determine where you would be at 0', 100', 200' 600', 1500' agl and think about where you would go if you lost an engine on/after takeoff.
Length of runway is one factor but not the only factor.  
----------MB_8CB94B171534DE8_1394_61_webmail-de02.sysops.aol.com--