X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:00:43 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-3597886@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <j.hafen@comcast.net>
Received: from QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.24] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13)
  with ESMTP id 3597706 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:49:52 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.30.24; envelope-from=j.hafen@comcast.net
Received: from OMTA01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.11])
	by QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id kRv81b00G0EPchoA2SpHfV; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:49:17 +0000
Received: from [10.0.1.3] ([98.247.30.133])
	by OMTA01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id kSot1b0072sKoey8MSpGZE; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:49:17 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119
X-Original-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:06:18 -0700
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Landing distance for a IVP ?
From: John Hafen <j.hafen@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
X-Original-Message-ID: <C6167ABA.363D%j.hafen@comcast.net>
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Landing distance for a IVP ?
Thread-Index: AcnEiaLwyv3Hi/GlEEmlGuxRns9CXA==
In-Reply-To: <list-3594811@logan.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="B_3323620156_203026"