Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #51235
From: Gary Casey <casey.gary@yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: Ram Air Design
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:23:01 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Fred,
Your design is as good as the Lancair design is bad.  Very elegant.  And it was me that wrote the original comment, not Glen - wouldn't want him to get blamed {:-).
Gary Casey

 

From Fred:


Glen wrote “In my opinion, the "ram air" (quotes used deliberately) tube that is on most Continental-engined Lancairs is the worst I have ever seen.”

I concur.  And having all those flapper valves with attachment hardware to swallow is asking for trouble in a high vibration environment.

I have attached a photo of my arrangement on my IO-550 Lancair IV.  The alternate air inlet is deliberately set back so that rain water is not inducted directly into the intake manifold.  The filter is one of Glen’s esteemed K&N models, not a paragon of filtering efficiency, but OK (not great) for airplanes operating in clean air in my opinion.  The flapper valve is attached to its shaft via epoxy and fibreglass wrap-around, no hardware to come loose and get sucked into the engine. 

The alternate air inlet was included to eliminate any air filter loss and get that last little bit of pressure rise.

It was a waste of time. There is no benefit compared to the air filter tucked inside the cowl.

I modified my cowl inlets to have 6 inch inlet diameter.  They are set away from the hub as shown in the second photo to maximize ram recovery, removing the low energy air stream near the spinner.  The ram pressure on top of the engine is the ram pressure delivered to engine intake manifold. 

By reading full throttle manifold pressure and comparing to indicated air speed I find that I am getting about 75%-80% ram efficiency with these inlets on my IO-550, but that is with the cowl flaps closed.  This equates to about 1.5 inches of Hg at 200-210 IAS when the total ram pressure is about 2.0 inches of Hg.  I get a bit less pressure rise with the cowl flaps open, perhaps half as much. 

I get virtually no benefit by opening the alternate air door and bypassing the air filter.  Sometimes I can see 0.1 in. Hg on the digital manifold pressure gauge, but that suggests that most of the time the benefit is less than 0.05 in. Hg.  The air filter, sized per K&N guidelines, has virtually negligible pressure drop.

One of my hangar mates has a new (to him) Cirrus SR-22 with the IO-550N engine.  It uses an oiled foam conical air inlet filter installed much like my K&N, but on the left side, and has an alternate air hose that sucks unfiltered warm air from the lower cowl area.  I suspect the warm air inlet is to meet certification requirements for flying in snow and ice crystals which may block the filter.  No reports yet on ram efficiency. However, the engine baffling set up is a thing of beauty, well thought out; no leaks, precision formed sheet metal, and extremely tight fitting rubber trim.  It is the best factory baffling set up I have ever seen.  If you see a Cirrus with the cowl off, have a very close look.

Fred Moreno


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster