X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:11:22 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-3596121@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <VTAILJEFF@aol.com>
Received: from imo-m23.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.4] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13)
  with ESMTP id 3595360 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:04:18 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.4; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com
Received: from  imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (imo-ma04.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.139]) by imo-m23.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN1-249f1d4c72f; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:03:35 -0400
Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com
	by imo-ma04.mx.aol.com  (mail_out_v40_r1.5.) id q.c8f.43822051 (37034)
	 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:03:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtprly-db01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-db01.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.152]) by cia-db02.mx.aol.com (v123.3) with ESMTP id MAILCIADB024-5bc549f1d4b714c; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:03:26 -0400
Received: from webmail-de02 (webmail-de02.webmail.aol.com [205.188.104.23]) by smtprly-db01.mx.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDB014-5bc549f1d4b714c; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:03:19 -0400
References: <list-3594811@logan.com>
X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Landing distance for a IVP ?
X-Original-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:03:19 -0400
X-AOL-IP: 64.12.78.139
In-Reply-To: <list-3594811@logan.com>
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: vtailjeff@aol.com
X-MB-Message-Type: User
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
 boundary="--------MB_8CB9304F05BCB10_11F8_89A2_webmail-de02.sysops.aol.com"
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 42679-STANDARD
Received: from 75.58.187.84 by webmail-de02.sysops.aol.com (205.188.104.23) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:03:19 -0400
X-Original-Message-Id: <8CB9304F0570658-11F8-4341@webmail-de02.sysops.aol.com>
X-Spam-Flag:NO


----------MB_8CB9304F05BCB10_11F8_89A2_webmail-de02.sysops.aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Amen!


-----Original Message-----
From: Brent Regan <brent@regandesigns.com>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 7:40 pm
Subject: [LML] Re: Landing distance for a IVP ?


John asks:
<< What do you guys use as far as personal minimums in runway length when=
 landing your IV=E2=80=99s?>>>

Home base for me (6ID1) is 2,200' x 40, 2,720 MSL. Due to terrain, landing=
 is to the east and slightly uphill. Usually there is a 3-5 Kt tail wind.=
 Landings can be accomplished in 1,400 to 1,800 feet under these condition=
s BUT it requires a LOT of practice. For me it took 500 hours in type and=
 over 1,000 landings before I could consistently nail my intended landing=
 spot at the needed speed (90 Kts).=C2=A0 Also, forget about greasers, the=
se are firm "positive contact" landings that I warn my passengers about.=
 

My first landing in a IV-P was on a 6,000' x 100' field and I needed 5,500=
' of it. 

There are several Lancairs including at least 2 IVs at KPAO which is 2400=
 feet and at sea level.

As a rule, never land on anything shorter than you have already demonstrat=
ed CONSISTENTLY on a longer field. 

You can land on short fields the same way you get to Carnegie Hall........=
. Practice, Practice, Practice.

Regards
Brent Regan





----------MB_8CB9304F05BCB10_11F8_89A2_webmail-de02.sysops.aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"

Amen!<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Brent Regan &lt;brent@regandesigns.com&gt;<br>
To: lml@lancaironline.net<br>
Sent: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 7:40 pm<br>
Subject: [LML] Re: Landing distance for a IVP ?<br>
<br>


<div id=3DAOLMsgPart_2_083ee4cc-5689-42bb-a1aa-fab3b398e48b>John asks:<br>
<BIG>&lt;&lt;<FONT face=3DArial><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 11pt"> What do=
 you guys use as far as personal minimums in runway length when landing yo=
ur IV=E2=80=99s?</SPAN></FONT>&gt;&gt;&gt;</BIG><br>
<br>
Home base for me (6ID1) is 2,200' x 40, 2,720 MSL. Due to terrain, landing=
 is to the east and slightly uphill. Usually there is a 3-5 Kt tail wind.=
 Landings can be accomplished in 1,400 to 1,800 feet under these condition=
s BUT it requires a LOT of practice. For me it took 500 hours in type and=
 over 1,000 landings before I could consistently nail my intended landing=
 spot at the needed speed (90 Kts).&nbsp; Also, forget about greasers, the=
se are firm "positive contact" landings that I warn my passengers about.=
 <br>
<br>
My first landing in a IV-P was on a 6,000' x 100' field and I needed 5,500=
' of it. <br>
<br>
There are several Lancairs including at least 2 IVs at KPAO which is 2400=
 feet and at sea level.<br>
<br>
As a rule, never land on anything shorter than you have already demonstrat=
ed CONSISTENTLY on a longer field. <br>
<br>
You can land on short fields the same way you get to Carnegie Hall........=
. Practice, Practice, Practice.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
Brent Regan<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_2_083ee4cc-5689-42bb-a1aa-fab3b
398e48b --><div id=3D'MAILCIADB024-5bc549f1d4b714c' class=3D'aol_ad_footer=
'><br/><font style=3D"color:black;font:normal 10pt arial,san-serif;"> <hr=
 style=3D"margin-top:10px"/><font color=3D"#006400">Green cleaning product=
s -- do they work as well?</font> <b><a href=3D"http://home.aol.com/new_in=
_home/photogallerytall/_a/spring-cleaning-products-put-to-the-test/2009040=
7180609990001?ncid=3Demlweushome00000001"><font color=3D"#006400">Find out=
 now!</font></a></b></font> </div>

----------MB_8CB9304F05BCB10_11F8_89A2_webmail-de02.sysops.aol.com--