|
I used tunson in powder form--heaver then lead--mixes with resin very well--scrap recycle places have it.
Paul Hershorin
360--471LA
From: "Sky2high@aol.com" <Sky2high@aol.com> To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 8:40:51 PM Subject: [LML] Re: Balancing MkII Elevators
Rob, et al,
Yep and a certain aileron that contains a trim tab and actuator require even more balance weight.
Grayhawk
In a message dated 4/22/2009 8:27:23 A.M. Central Daylight Time, rwolf99@aol.com writes:
I, too, was surprised at how much lead I needed to balance my 360 ailerons. In fact, I have those lead half-rounds going nearly full-span (two of them, flat surface to flat surface). But let's stop to think about it. We need as much "moment" (mass x distance) in front of the hinge line as behind it. In practice, we have more weight (balance weight) forward of the hinge line than we do behind it (the control surface itself) since the CG of the control surface is generally much further behind the hinge line than the balance weights are forward of it. This is certainly the case with the ailerons, but less so for the rudder and elevators, since they have those forward overhangs for aerodynamic balance.
For preliminary design purposes, my airplane design group
assumes that the balance weights weigh 1.5 times the weight of the control surface alone.
Bottom line -- your balance weights need to be at least as heavy as the control surface, and up to 50% more.
Yup, it's a lot.
- Rob Wolf
Big savings on Dell XPS Laptops and Desktops! |
|