X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:52:45 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d20.mx.aol.com ([205.188.139.136] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with ESMTP id 3573949 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:01:45 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.139.136; envelope-from=PJHWFD@aol.com Received: from PJHWFD@aol.com by imo-d20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v39.1.) id q.ce6.4ab16bc7 (34907) for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:01:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-db03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-db03.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.154]) by cia-da02.mx.aol.com (v123.3) with ESMTP id MAILCIADA024-5c3b49dcd84e6b; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:01:05 -0400 Received: from WEBMAIL-DY31 (webmail-dy31.sim.aol.com [205.188.148.11]) by smtprly-db03.mx.aol.com (v123.3) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDB031-5c3b49dcd84e6b; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:01:02 -0400 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Oil Pan Concerns X-Original-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:01:02 -0400 X-AOL-IP: 71.161.215.50 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Peter Hebert X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CB8682BB6C3935_1120_37E0_WEBMAIL-DY31.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 42402-STANDARD Received: from 71.161.215.50 by WEBMAIL-DY31.sysops.aol.com (205.188.148.11) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:01:02 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CB8682BB37C5FD-1120-1B8E@WEBMAIL-DY31.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO ----------MB_8CB8682BB6C3935_1120_37E0_WEBMAIL-DY31.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I had interference problems after installing the shorter control arms on the nose gear strut and ended up putting the original arms back on.? The retracted geometry is different. Peter Hebert -----Original Message----- From: Steve Colwell To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:52 am Subject: [LML] Oil Pan Concerns If someone needs a Oil Pan Gasket for a Continental IO-550N, I have one I did not use I will sell for half what I have in it.? Why do I have it?? The retracted ?nose gear linkage on a Legacy RG is very close to the bottom of the Oil Pan.? I was all set to remove the pan when an A&P suggested denting the pan enough for adequate clearance. ?It was easy and a much less complicated fix. ?Low time Legacy owners, check your clearance after the first 20/40 hours, you might be amazed how little you have after the mounts have settled. ? Steve Colwell ----------MB_8CB8682BB6C3935_1120_37E0_WEBMAIL-DY31.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" I had interference problems after installing the shorter control arms on the nose gear strut and ended up putting the original arms back on.  The retracted geometry is different.

Peter Hebert

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919@yahoo.com>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:52 am
Subject: [LML] Oil Pan Concerns

If someone needs a Oil Pan Gasket for a Continental IO-550N, I have one I did not use I will sell for half what I have in it.  Why do I have it?  The retracted  nose gear linkage on a Legacy RG is very close to the bottom of the Oil Pan.  I was all set to remove the pan when an A&P suggested denting the pan enough for adequate clearance.  It was easy and a much less complicated fix.  Low time Legacy owners, check your clearance after the first 20/40 hours, you might be amazed how little you have after the mounts have settled.
 
Steve Colwell
----------MB_8CB8682BB6C3935_1120_37E0_WEBMAIL-DY31.sysops.aol.com--