|
Angier,
It's worse than you thought. Garmin GPS WAAS antennas require a
minimum of about 13 feet of antenna wire length or a lot of connectors
because of some expected minimum loss betwixt the antenna and the magic
box.
Whoopie should come from you on your first flight - perhaps in this
decade.
Scott
In a message dated 2/23/2009 5:16:59 P.M. Central Standard Time,
N4ZQ@comcast.net writes:
Hi
Scott,
I agree with your comment on 430W, I have it in my Mooney. I
also agree that TACS capability is of somewhat limited value in the
IFR environment. As you well know, I began construction of my 360
way back in the last century when you were still a twinkle in
somebody's eye. Had I known about WAAS, I might have at least
planned ahead to provide for an eventual upgrade. My (new) Apollo
GX60 is approaching dinosaur status and has no upgrade path for
WAAS.
If I got really enthusiastic and all fired up about a WAAS
upgrade, I would remove my GX60 and SL70 and their trays from
the stack. They could then start a new life as paper weights on my
desk. A new Garmin WAAS unit could then occupy that footprint. The
SL30 nav/com would move to the bottom of the stack and the old
transponder would need to be replaced with a remote located
transponder. A lot of work that would interfere with plans to become
airborne this year... The only part of my gps system that is WAAS
compatible is the RG400 antenna cable.... and it runs in
a bundle with the 4 9900B, 1 com and 1 marker beacon cables on the
left side of the cockpit.
I'd be a little bit irritated if I went the
upgrade path described, only to find out that the 9900B cables were
makin' WHOOPY with the GPS cable....how's that for electronic
speak?
Angier Ames N4ZQ N3ZQ
-- For archives and unsub
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
|
|