X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:36:14 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3503919 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:17:32 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.67; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=mK55fy7jBZid5A0uHMm9LWuERt/om0AhRjWyVr2GPDoJYeBVnebWJW5o+p9IsEgI; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [216.57.118.63] (helo=ccaselt3) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Lasf2-0005WN-Oo for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:16:56 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <010201c9942f$0b536bc0$0c8d020a@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Ryan 9900B X-Original-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:16:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da940f333dab3a2ff8a9517311d5922f46230350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 216.57.118.63 Angier, If it were me, I would separate them. I do have Waas now and am finding it's much more finicky than non-waas. The failure mode is not lower accuracy but it simply goes off line completely. This is most unpleasant. I think Waas is inevitable for you. The economics of ground-based landing systems are "difficult". Colyn