Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #50410
From: Tom Gourley <tom.gourley@verizon.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] antenna questions
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:02:41 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
 
"The rg-400 coax is better that the rg-58, but both work if properly installed. It's best to separate the coax from other  wires, both power and signal."
 
 
Amen.  I recently resolved a problem on a Legacy FG where the engine temp readings would go erratic when transmitting on the com radios.  This is an e-glass FG and uses a duplexer (not the same as a diplexer) to share an antenna between the two com radios.  All connections are RG-400. What I found was a com coax nearly touching the wire bundle going from the engine monitor to the engine thermocouples.  I separated the coax and wire bundle by about 2" and the problem went away.  Given the fairly robust shielding of RG-400 I was initially surprised by this.  But when you think about it the shield of a coax carries RF currents, just like the center conductor.  Granted the shield is connected to ground but ground is simply a reference point and at high frequencies the AC voltage along the shield of a coax will not be zero volts with respect to ground.  There won't be much voltage wrt to ground, but when the coax is very close to a sensitive signal, like a thermocouple wire, it doesn't take much to cause interference. 
 
Tom Gourley
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster