X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 06:58:10 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.183] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.11) with ESMTPS id 3407681 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 07:51:56 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.183; envelope-from=fredmoreno@optusnet.com.au Received: from Razzle ([202.139.5.198]) (authenticated sender fredmoreno) by mail02.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n02Cp2Gd028387 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 23:51:10 +1100 From: "Fred Moreno" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mail" Subject: FW: reversing MT X-Original-Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:50:59 +0900 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6838 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Thread-Index: Acls1QVKAsFZP25cQjC/syKTHM/lhAAAMgog Importance: Normal Jeff wrote: "...The composite MT prop (even with the nickel leading edge) takes=20 a beating and gets pitted easily. Making this a reversing prop (that=20 is, going into Beta) invites heavy ingestion of rocks and debris=20 sucked back up into the prop after it passes over them..." I can not comment on the reversing prop, but can confirm that the MT = props have nearly zero tolerance for even small rocks and bits of small gravel that may be picked up. The leading edge sheath is very thin, and backed = up with wood. Thus it does not take much to make a big dent, much bigger = than would occur with an all metal blade.=20 With the MT prop, if the dent in the leading edge is less than about a quarter of an inch wide, AND a tap test completed around the ding with a large coin AT EVERY PREFLIGHT shows no hollow areas, they you are good = to go. More than a quarter of an inch, or any area of hollow sound, particularly one that grows over time, means the prop is not flight = worthy, and has to go to an MT dealer for an expensive and time consuming = repair. =20 The quote for restoring three blades to new conditions was eight weeks = and nearly half the purchase price of the prop. Once repaired, the same = damage can occur on the next flight if the little stone with your name on it happens to be in the right place. =20 I punted instead. Consider the MT to be viable on clean (preferably swept) paved runways, taxiways, hangar areas and run up areas. Or keep a spare prop if you = can not tolerate several weeks of shipping and repair time. MT is slow to = ship the sheaths and repair kits that include special epoxy and vacuum = bagging supplies to put the new sheath on the blade. After that a lot of time-consuming hand finishing and painting are required to complete the repair. Don't forget that you need a crate for the round trip as well. = If you get that rock at a strip far from home, you will have to leave the airplane and catch a kerosene burner. I concur that if you want a reversing prop, you should stay on very = clean pavement with NO loose stones present. Also, avoid all winter-time ice = that might be flicked up to eat a leading edge sheath. But if you operate = off pristine, clean pavement, then more than likely, you do not need a = reversing prop.=20 Fred Moreno, ex-MT prop operator