Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #49356
From: Gary Edwards <gary21sn@hotmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: 235 Oleo Nose Strut
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:07:34 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
What concerns me in your post is the part about installing a 360 with CS prop in a 235 airframe.  Have you discussed that installation with any other 235 builders?  To be a bit negative, this idea has death written all over it.
 
With fuel, the plane will be way over the 1400/1500 pound factory specified gross weight unless you fly it remotely with no pilot or passenger aboard.  And unless you put a significant counter weight (like the battery) on the rear horiz. stab., the plane will be nose heavy and out of the usable CG range.  Also, the cowls will have to be extensively modified as they are not wide enough to accommodate a 360.
 
Oh, about the 235 strut.  They can sent to the factory to be re-built and upgraded for about $850.
 
Gary Edwards
LNC2 235/320
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 5:02 PM
Subject: [LML] 235 Oleo Nose Strut

I am asking for information concerning the pnuematic oleo nose strut for a Lancair 235.  I have been looking for a strut to convert my 235 from the stiff dog leg style to the pneumatic one.  I am confused as to which ones are the correct one.  I understand some have poor centering capability(early model) and some are from various manufacturers.  I am sure some of you have seen the one for sale on Ebay.  Is the one of the good ones or one to stay away from.  I have the same question about the front nose fork also.  I intend to run an IO360 with c/prop if this has any bearing as to the weight.  If any one has any information about this please let me know.  I would like to obtain the right one the first time.  Thanks!  Brent
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster