X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:14:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from outbound-mail.vgs.untd.com ([64.136.55.15] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.6) with SMTP id 3092658 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:10:05 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.55.15; envelope-from=jkezele@juno.com X-UOL-TAGLINE: true Received: from outbound-bu1.vgs.untd.com (webmail14.vgs.untd.com [10.181.12.154]) by smtpout06.vgs.untd.com with SMTP id AABEMF33XAJ9EWEJ for (sender ); Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:09:09 -0700 (PDT) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: 9OvJUXd2tUqhLb258iQtPertMPmQfFB+7lEXntmY0qI4TbFbRaCd8A== Received: (from jkezele@juno.com) by webmail14.vgs.untd.com (jqueuemail) id NTF4GQXF; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:08:38 PDT Received: from [207.225.33.147] by webmail14.vgs.untd.com with HTTP: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:07:34 GMT X-Originating-IP: [207.225.33.147] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "jkezele@juno.com" X-Original-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:07:34 GMT X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: RE: Sumulation X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0 X-Original-Message-Id: <20080825.110734.26617.0@webmail14.vgs.untd.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 X-ContentStamp: 2:2:2974742067 X-MAIL-INFO:36a080748060601560e5bdc00449f941658515d07dd0e419cdc4647dadad65100140fda080 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.181.12.154|webmail14.vgs.untd.com|outbound-bu1.vgs.untd.com|jkezele@juno.com Bill, I am currently building a Lancair 360 that I purchase two year ago at th= e same time after reading all the manuals twice I designed a Lancair 360= to fly in X-plane. I have been involve with simulators since 1989 and = have found them to be very beneficial if used properly. My version of t= he 360 for x-plane is currently undergoing some graphic enhancements to = improve the visual accuracy, however, I believe the aerodynamics are ver= y close. I work with a couple of individuals that have the programing e= xpertise to build PC based simulators that are extremely accurate. At C= lassic Jet Sims (www.classicjetsims.com), I was originally involved as t= he Microsoft Flight Simulator (MSFS)aircraft design engineer. I quickly= realized that X-plane was superior in my opinion for aircraft design be= cause it works on the principle of what I call an "electronic wind tunne= l", MSFS uses complex "look up" tables. Our original design goal was t= o create a cost effect simulator for jet warbird training, at first the = T-33 since I flew that aircraft and had easy access to test data. At fi= rst there was a steep learning curve as we learn to use plug-in code to = make the aircraft fly as the real aircraft flies. Something that I have= found to be lacking in home based sims for a long time. We then create= d a real time virtual formation simulator for training to reduce our cos= ts because in jet warbirds we were burning 200-350 gal/hour. We have fo= und that with a correctly designed simulator with accurate flight dynami= cs, proper modeling of systems, we have been able to improve our level o= f training at a fraction of the cost. A huge asset to us was the fact t= hat no T-33 had the same instrument and sub panel layouts. We were able= to design cockpit specific models to improve situational awareness, as = well as manipulate weight and balance data between aircraft. We even mo= del CG changes with fuel burn and loads. We also incorporated an integra= ted instructor station that allows our instructors to function from arou= nd the country via the Internet or physically linked computers. We are = accurate to less than 1% of actual flight test data in the T-33 sim. We have been very busy finishing up a F-18 project as well as the finish= ing touches on the L-39. I talked to Greg Hofer yesterday about finishi= ng the graphic enhancement on the Lancair so that we can have a few beta= testers to check on the flight dynamics since I do not have very much t= est data. You can look around on our web page to see the work that has = taken place so far for jet warbirds. A word of caution, simulator based training needs to be well planned to = avoid negative transfer of learning. I can comment more on that at a la= ter time if people are interested. When simulators are used to model sy= stem emergency, especially ones that would be unsafe to practice in the = real aircraft, they can be very beneficial. An example in the T-33 woul= d be an avionics door not being latched on preflight that comes open in = flight. A similar one in the lancair may be a canopy not being latched.= I am sure from reading the LML that many of you have experiences that = can be recreated in the sim for all to practice and learn from. A simul= ator is very effective when used to improve situational awareness, for e= xample, accurate terrain models that allow a pilot to practice instrumen= t approaches and upon break out the pilot can recognize terrain feature = for orientation, or in the case of formation the dynamics of multiple ai= rcraft. I will up load some of the Lancair 360 info to the web page in = a day or two for review. It will fun to finish this project up for more= then myself. When fuel was cheap nobody wanted to be in the sim! Now = in the military, everybody is spending a lot of time in the sim! Regards John Kezele = ____________________________________________________________ Click to learn how to become a world famous writer or poet. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3mz77Yzv8ayctthGUJRlFY= LdLUTip0ztSFmzR9vRMh8QC6yt/