Return-Path: Received: from olympus.net ([198.133.237.6]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 29 Feb 2000 10:45:17 -0500 Received: from ptpm131.olympus.net ([198.133.237.161] helo=station4) by olympus.net with smtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12PovA-0004t2-00 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Tue, 29 Feb 2000 07:50:48 -0800 Message-ID: <01c201bf82cc$e1ee66e0$0464a8c0@station4> From: "John Barrett" <2thman@olympus.net> To: "Lancair Mail List" Subject: Modified MS20001P hinge Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 07:51:45 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> For Angier Ames, The teflon insert idea has been around for awhile and I haven't heard any complaints from those who've used it. But certainly, the smaller pin is weaker. Consider instead replacing the hinge with CARBINGE - a graphite hinge with nylon insert. Teflon creeps and flows under frictional stress and pressure. The Carbinge has a pin the same size as the MS20001. Our tests show it will not wear and fret like the aluminum hinges. It's life expectancy therefore should be MUCH greater than either the original milspec hinge or the modified one. Also the Carbinge is much lighter than the aluminum and it doesn't leave the black streaks of oxidized aluminum on your aircraft. Check out the Carbinge data and pictures at: http://www.flash.net/~infaero/ Or contact me by email for more information. Regards, John Barrett PO Box 428 Pt. Hadlock, WA 98339 L-IVP 360 385 1000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>