Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #47912
From: Greg Ward <gregw@onestopdesign.biz>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Brake Lines
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 18:19:22 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
In my case, I used 1/4" o.d. stainless steel for everything but the flex part, and I just made those up out of braided flex.  Pedals are hard, which is what I wanted, nothing worse than squishy brakes when you need them, nasty feeling.
Greg Ward
Lancair 20B N178RG in progress.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 4:58 AM
Subject: [LML] Brake Lines

Now before anyone tells me to check the archives, I have.  Back in 2006, Brent published his opinion on brake lines, stating in part

 

"DH Instruments test hose is the best solution for the flexible portions of the brake lines (gear leg and petal cylinders). They have been exhaustively covered in previous threads."

 

Well I have just finished going back and forth with DHI (now a part of Fluke) for the last week.  Long story short, they said they've installed a new MRP system and it's too much work to create a custom length product any longer.  They recommended Swagelok.  The sales guy actually put that in an email!

 

The ridiculousness of that statement aside, I'm now pondering my alternatives for the flex portion of the brake lines (basically to and from the pedals, as well as to and from the gear legs).  The plastic tubing is out of the question, so what is the next best alternative after DHI?

 

One other question.  I have a newer kit, so I'm assuming that the plastic tubing in the gear legs has been replaced by aluminum.  Haven't actually checked it yet.  Can anyone confirm this?  Any issues?

 

This mailing list in an invaluable resource.  I appreciate everything I get from it.

 

Thanks!

 

Scott Seagrave

IV-P

N721MS (still building)


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster