Return-Path: Received: from m3.boston.juno.com ([205.231.100.198]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 21:32:47 -0500 Received: from cookie.juno.com by cookie.juno.com for <"7LRIubhLn1VLcKB8GrXnbRmJuVgqJzshtjGAWaJXYxoLOmmzF2Oez/L531Hlj6jg"> Received: (from earl_schroeder@juno.com) by m3.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EZVP4WYB; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 21:37:34 EST To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 20:41:56 -0600 Subject: Re: Electrical bonding for static buildup Message-ID: <20000227.204218.-791429.3.Earl_Schroeder@juno.com> From: Earl E Schroeder X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I do not pretend to be an expert in this field but IMHO and after attending numerous forums where this was discussed at OSH over the years, I believe bonding has more benefits for reducing radio interference and improving radio reception than preventing explosions during refueling. That said, if bonding DOES reduce the spark potential in any way, that alone is enough reason for doing it. In my LNC2 I have bonded the filler neck to the vent line to the al tubing (which the aileron push tube passes through) to the rest of the metal parts of the airframe and finally to the engine. Where al is connected to al I used al welding filler rods (3/32" or what ever size was handy) wrapping them around each part several rounds. I drilled a small hole in the far end of the filler neck to attach the ground wire with a small bolt & nut. Other places I used ground straps (like battery grounds only smaller) purchased at fly-markets. I intend to FIRST connect the grounding line (available at nearly all refueling stations) to the exhaust pipes on the engine, then with the metal refueling nozzle in one hand remove the fuel cap with the other. Holding my breath, I insert the nozzle touching the metal ring, begin refueling and resume normal breathing.... hopefully. Again IMHO, I believe the possibility of a near lighting strike (just a 'leader') and it's associated mega current searching for the least conductive path is a much more serious threat to turning the Lancair into an instant bomb than from refueling. I've also attended numerous Osh forums on this subject and it literally scares your pants off.... The picture of the Piper with its blown off fiberglass wing tip caused by the instant vaporization(causing pressure build up) of the 18 ga wire running to the nav light really got my attention. Crashes where the control rods were welded together at the hinge joints also makes me avoid thunderstorm areas even wider. Then they show vertical lightning coming out the top of clouds and report that lightning has been observed in clear air with no clouds in sight...... I know, maybe we worry too much.. Earl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>