X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 14:31:17 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail11.tpgi.com.au ([203.12.160.161] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPS id 2928135 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 18 May 2008 20:08:13 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.12.160.161; envelope-from=domcrain@tpg.com.au X-TPG-Antivirus: Passed Received: from CRAIN (60-241-193-89.static.tpgi.com.au [60.241.193.89]) by mail11.tpgi.com.au (envelope-from domcrain@tpg.com.au) (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4J07OAd022481 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 10:07:26 +1000 From: "Dominic V Crain" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: Re: Turn back to the Airport after engine failure X-Original-Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 10:06:54 +1000 X-Original-Message-ID: <008801c8b944$40468fe0$0201a8c0@CRAIN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0089_01C8B998.11F29FE0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6838 Importance: Normal Thread-Index: Aci5MlLgokqDqOpTT/O+zC0QyHxFZQAEFoHQ In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0089_01C8B998.11F29FE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lynn, me ol' China - no one is shouting the idea down. There ARE issues with this procedure and better they be aired herein, = which, unless I'm mistaken, is set up for this thread as much as anything. ALL pilots think they are God's gift etc., to the business. We all think = our ideas are the best. I happen to dispute this procedure as being a wise mindset, as I think the evidence is that, practice or not, the end = result is more fatal than not. But deny Bill or anyone else his right to debate, is equally unwise. Just on one point you made, what is the right altitude? It is a fair bet that the right altitude puts you laterally beyond reach of your = departure airfield, in which case it might be better to concentrate on what's = ahead in the splay. Cheers Dom VH-CZJ =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0089_01C8B998.11F29FE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Lynn, me ol’ = China – no one is shouting the idea = down.

There ARE issues with this = procedure and better they be aired herein, which, unless I’m mistaken, is set up = for this thread as much as anything.

ALL pilots think they are = God’s gift etc., to the business. We all think our ideas are the best. I happen to = dispute this procedure as being a wise mindset, as I think the evidence is that, practice or not, the end result is more fatal than = not.

But deny Bill or anyone else his = right to debate, is equally unwise.

Just on one point you made, what = is the right altitude? It is a fair bet that the right altitude puts you = laterally beyond reach of your departure airfield, in which case it might be = better to concentrate on what’s ahead in the splay.

Cheers

Dom

VH-CZJ

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0089_01C8B998.11F29FE0--