X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 18:38:51 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2922365@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <jffisher@gmail.com>
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3)
  with ESMTP id 2922330 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 May 2008 17:59:42 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=72.14.220.152; envelope-from=jffisher@gmail.com
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so127750fge.1
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 14 May 2008 14:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=E1oBfi9Yjs+DIbYSzd2x/6c4PNS4MoiE1AJaUe5CCcyzZPi729YVuJ/TIlFsQvBoiI7kH1fu/YRQQEFEaxd/5JtBSeurnWm9pcGSTDsSL1Q67Udfs20p9KkqLZ/AU3n3A76Rj4Xe/6bn+mPhayo7g3cZQOR/eeFnh48cQtOGdRo=
Received: by 10.78.132.2 with SMTP id f2mr415234hud.83.1210802344332;
        Wed, 14 May 2008 14:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.157.8 with HTTP; Wed, 14 May 2008 14:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Message-ID: <af33cdf20805141459x33b0aff7taaa831f6d799e63d@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:59:04 -0500
From: "Jeremy Fisher" <jffisher@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Horizontal Induction
In-Reply-To: <list-2921767@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_3370_29123479.1210802344324"
References: <list-2921767@logan.com>

------=_Part_3370_29123479.1210802344324
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Randy,

Yes, there are several alternative systems.  Superior used to make a
composite one, now changed to metal, and there are a couple of other
alternatives.  My question was on the impact of using this type of induction
is a 360 cowling.  Chris' reply answers that by stating that the impact on
both the cowling and the exhaust system is severe.  I will have to stick
with vertical induction.

Jerry


On 5/14/08, Randy <randystuart@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>  *Are you asking about the cold induction systems for 360's? There's one
> by Superior, one by ECI and another by a mid west fabricator ( I can't
> remember the name). *
> **
> *Randy Stuart*
> *LNC-2*
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Jeremy Fisher <jffisher@gmail.com>
> *To:* lml@lancaironline.net
> *Sent:* Sunday, May 11, 2008 5:01 PM
> *Subject:* [LML] Horizontal Induction
>
>
> Has anyone fitted a 360 with a Lycoming engine with horizontal induction?
> I am about to buy my engine, and am tempted by the apparent benefits of
> using a horizontal induction sump.  However Superior for one stated that
> their orignal sump did not fit a 360.  If you did fit an engine with
> horizontal induction, what modifications to the cowling and the exhaust were
> needed, and was it worth it?  Thanks.
>
> Jerry Fisher
>
>

------=_Part_3370_29123479.1210802344324
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div>Randy,</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Yes, there are several alternative systems.&nbsp; Superior used to make a composite one, now changed to metal, and there are a couple of other alternatives.&nbsp; My question was on the impact of using this type of induction is a 360 cowling.&nbsp; Chris&#39; reply answers that by stating that the impact on both the cowling and the exhaust system is severe.&nbsp; I will have to stick with vertical induction.</div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Jerry<br><br>&nbsp;</div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/14/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Randy</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:randystuart@hotmail.com">randystuart@hotmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff">
<div><strong><font face="Georgia" size="2">Are you asking about the cold induction systems for 360&#39;s? There&#39;s one by Superior, one by ECI and another by a mid west fabricator ( I can&#39;t remember the name). </font></strong></div>

<div><strong><font face="Georgia" size="2"></font></strong>&nbsp;</div><span class="sg">
<div><strong><font face="Georgia" size="2">Randy Stuart</font></strong></div>
<div><strong><font face="Georgia" size="2">LNC-2</font></strong></div></span>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><span class="q">
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </div>
<div style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial"><b>From:</b> <a title="jffisher@gmail.com" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:jffisher@gmail.com" target="_blank">Jeremy Fisher</a> </div>

<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>To:</b> <a title="lml@lancaironline.net" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:lml@lancaironline.net" target="_blank">lml@lancaironline.net</a> </div></span><span class="q">
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Sent:</b> Sunday, May 11, 2008 5:01 PM</div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Subject:</b> [LML] Horizontal Induction</div>
<div><br>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Has anyone fitted a 360 with a Lycoming&nbsp;engine with horizontal induction?&nbsp; I am about to buy my engine, and am tempted by the apparent benefits of using a horizontal induction sump.&nbsp; However Superior for one stated that their&nbsp;orignal sump did not fit a 360.&nbsp; If you did fit an engine with horizontal induction, what modifications to the cowling and the exhaust were needed, and was it worth it?&nbsp; Thanks.</div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Jerry Fisher</div></span></blockquote></div></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_3370_29123479.1210802344324--