X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:06:07 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2863305@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <air.peter@googlemail.com>
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.2)
  with ESMTP id 2863107 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:05:13 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.249.92.171; envelope-from=air.peter@googlemail.com
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o4so325978uge.7
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mimeole:message-id;
        b=pCdmzGl2qwlAR7NywMZjbThTUSoaQTB4Acz1x8kRUILDn4o2PxXJw/grlUTgKjOFzF/u/1Wn5+mjc6GVGz3eYqZZqCl/pZv558GKOA+tBw++c1BHoqLpppwI5KYhHBMqI03qdCvm3Uv30IftmHFVCFDdMFMsaukKvdKplyk4ce4=
Received: by 10.67.88.12 with SMTP id q12mr2424548ugl.89.1208621070852;
        Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Return-Path: <air.peter@googlemail.com>
Received: from Inbox ( [89.55.159.9])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w28sm806266uge.79.2008.04.19.09.04.27
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Fly_fast" <air.peter@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Prop diameter
X-Original-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:05:06 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.1432.1
X-Original-Message-ID: <480a180d.1cae420a.4a7e.3404@mx.google.com>

Hello all,
I am building a 360 MKII and got an used Hartzell 2 blade prop, normally used for an IO360 with 76" of diameter. It is recommended to shorten it to 70" to 72".
What arebyour experiences with prop diameters, independently of manufacturer?
Disregarding recomendations due to engine vibrations, my biggest concern is prop clearance. 
As every inch counts for efficiency, I do not want to pay for (often) repairs after ground contact.
Any hints (getting more clearance...) and recomendations are highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Peter 360 MKII, 90%