X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:45:15 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2755156@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <tom.gourley@verizon.net>
Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.44] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0)
  with ESMTP id 2753758 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:00:49 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.252.44; envelope-from=tom.gourley@verizon.net
Received: from jacky0da39824a ([71.111.151.32])
 by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr
 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JWO00CLADV8TAX1@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for
 lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:59:36 -0600 (CST)
X-Original-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:59:24 -0800
From: "Tom Gourley" <tom.gourley@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 51% rule?
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Reply-to: "Tom Gourley" <tom.gourley@verizon.net>
X-Original-Message-id: <003801c875d8$dce8a900$660610ac@jacky0da39824a>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=response
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <list-2752843@logan.com>

> so....not to get off track here or anything.....but shouldn't the issue be 
> how to make the planes safe?
> vs. who did the work?


There you go, assuming logic and reason might enter into a bureaucrat's 
thought processes.

Tom Gourley