X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:51:06 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0) with ESMTP id 2750660 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:24:05 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.157.37; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id q.d47.214a336e (29678) for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:23:21 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:23:21 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Additional Tail Strength X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1203571401" X-Mailer: Unknown sub 34 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1203571401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Doug, If you are going to fly the airplane within the design envelope, it probably isn't necessary. I haven't heard of any tails being twisted off. I understand that there may be additional concern from folks with the MKII tail as the larger surface could impute greater stress. It is not easy to work back there once the tail is closed out. Perhaps others will chime in. Scott In a message dated 2/20/2008 2:21:26 P.M. Central Standard Time, dbaleshta@tru.ca writes: I just finished closing the Vertical Stab. Do you think it would be worthwhile to get back in there and try to complete the oval just before the spar/bulkhead ahead of the horizon Stab (not sure I can squirm in there)? Would additional bid on the strake, to the baggage bulkhead help instead? **************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/ 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598) -------------------------------1203571401 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Doug,

If you are going to fly the airplane within the design envelope, i= t=20 probably isn't necessary. I haven't heard of any tails being twisted=20 off. I understand that there may be additional concern from folks with= the=20 MKII tail as the larger surface could impute greater stress. It i= s=20 not easy to work back there once the tail is closed out. Perhaps other= s=20 will chime in.

Scott

In a message dated 2/20/2008 2:21:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 dbaleshta@tru.ca writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>I just=20 finished closing the Vertical Stab. Do you think it would be worthwh= ile=20 to get back in there and try to complete the oval just before the=20 spar/bulkhead ahead of the horizon Stab (not sure I can squirm in=20 there)? Would additional bid on the strake, to the baggage bulkhead=20= help=20 instead?

Delicious ideas to please the pickiest eaters. Watch the video on AOL Living.

-------------------------------1203571401--