To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:58:20 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2729440@logan.com>
From: "Paul Lipps" <elippse@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: LNC-2 past 200k
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_019C_01C86E6E.0A211FA0"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_019C_01C86E6E.0A211FA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Oscar Grassle's 160HP 235/320 would go 240mph/208.5k at 3150rpm at 5500' =
dalt with my two-blade design; that's what you would expect with a 187HP =
engine at 2700rpm. It would also go 233mph/202.4k at 3090rpm at 10,000' =
dalt, or the equivalent of 183HP engine at 2700rpm! These numbers were =
verified with a GPS on two-way runs. At 1000' dalt, it would go =
242mph/210.3k at 3200rpm, the same as a 189.6HP engine at 2700rpm.
------=_NextPart_000_019C_01C86E6E.0A211FA0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1252">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Oscar Grassle's 160HP&nbsp;235/320 would go =
240mph/208.5k=20
at 3150rpm at 5500' dalt with my two-blade design; that's what you would =
expect=20
with a 187HP engine at 2700rpm. It would also&nbsp;go 233mph/202.4k at =
3090rpm=20
at 10,000' dalt, or the equivalent of 183HP engine at 2700rpm! These =
numbers=20
were verified with a GPS on two-way runs. At 1000' dalt, it would go=20
242mph/210.3k at 3200rpm, the same as a 189.6HP engine&nbsp;at=20
2700rpm.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_019C_01C86E6E.0A211FA0--