To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:58:20 -0500 Message-ID: <redirect-2729440@logan.com> From: "Paul Lipps" <elippse@sbcglobal.net> Subject: LNC-2 past 200k Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_019C_01C86E6E.0A211FA0" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_019C_01C86E6E.0A211FA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oscar Grassle's 160HP 235/320 would go 240mph/208.5k at 3150rpm at 5500' = dalt with my two-blade design; that's what you would expect with a 187HP = engine at 2700rpm. It would also go 233mph/202.4k at 3090rpm at 10,000' = dalt, or the equivalent of 183HP engine at 2700rpm! These numbers were = verified with a GPS on two-way runs. At 1000' dalt, it would go = 242mph/210.3k at 3200rpm, the same as a 189.6HP engine at 2700rpm. ------=_NextPart_000_019C_01C86E6E.0A211FA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dwindows-1252"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Oscar Grassle's 160HP 235/320 would go = 240mph/208.5k=20 at 3150rpm at 5500' dalt with my two-blade design; that's what you would = expect=20 with a 187HP engine at 2700rpm. It would also go 233mph/202.4k at = 3090rpm=20 at 10,000' dalt, or the equivalent of 183HP engine at 2700rpm! These = numbers=20 were verified with a GPS on two-way runs. At 1000' dalt, it would go=20 242mph/210.3k at 3200rpm, the same as a 189.6HP engine at=20 2700rpm.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_019C_01C86E6E.0A211FA0--