X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:29:54 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta13.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTP id 2632519 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:12:24 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.168.78.44; envelope-from=super_chipmunk@roadrunner.com Received: from Laptop ([74.75.176.139]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20080105231143.GORE12952.mta13.adelphia.net@Laptop> for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:11:43 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <04D6AEE4DF474FFD8199F004C846C1A5@Laptop> From: "Bill Wade" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Fine wire plugs X-Original-Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:11:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002C_01C84FC6.6442FDD0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C84FC6.6442FDD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was checking the specs on the TSIO-550E and noticed that only RHB32E ma= ssive electrode plugs are approved. My understanding was that fine wire plu= gs were preferred for turbocharged engines. The Ram Aircraft website prefer= s them, making the case that they provide better ignition, less strain on t= he magnetos, and they last longer. Any thoughts on why they aren't approved for this engine? -Bill Wade ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C84FC6.6442FDD0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
  I was checking the specs on the TSI= O-550E=20 and noticed that only RHB32E massive electrode plugs are approved. My=20 understanding was that fine wire plugs were preferred for turbocharged engi= nes.=20 The Ram Aircraft website prefers them, making the case that they provide be= tter=20 ignition, less strain on the magnetos, and they last longer.
 
  Any thoughts on why they=20 aren't approved for this engine?  =20 -Bill Wade
------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C84FC6.6442FDD0--