X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 03:16:27 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.94] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with SMTP id 2503369 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:28:47 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.229.94; envelope-from=lorn@dynacomm.ws Received: (qmail 19397 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2007 20:28:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.127?) (lorn@ameritech.net@70.184.168.9 with plain) by smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 2007 20:28:10 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: fMSklEIVM1knCxuSTB4THFnTot_KkTOkOt3dp6EPVyGClHVNoP0PNXznJTpsTOvh36rXUqiUiNTuANAuKOXpGQibZIG8DTdGLniTfcW6U2aBQKzDtQ-- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Original-To: Lancair List X-Original-Message-Id: <2AC3354D-CA0B-4953-B9CC-86785F77057B@dynacomm.ws> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-733037888 From: Lorn H Olsen Subject: Re: LNC2 cabin heat muff X-Original-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:28:06 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) --Apple-Mail-1-733037888 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed I packed my heat muff with stainless steel Brillo pads. I believe that this should help to absorb as much of the heat as can be from the exhaust pipe. I have also rapped the Heat muff (under the clamps) with asbestos equivalent tape. I keep the #1 exhaust gas probe away from the clamp with RTV. I have been running this setup for about 3 years without a problem. Our heat rap is used for both the carb (if you have one) heat and the cabin heat. RVs use 2 heat muffs. I think that that would be a better setup. On my trip from Detroit to Norfolk yesterday I flew at 11,500 ft with a carb temp of -6. I could only raise the temp to +2. If my carb had iced, I could have had a problem. If anyone knows, I would like to know what the temperature rise is on a production plane. I have had an A&P tell me that the temperature should go up by 20 or 30 degrees. I flew in a Tiger with a carb temp probe and only saw the temperature go up about 10 degrees. Can anyone out there tell me how far other carb temp gauges raise? > From: "Greenbacks, UnLtd." > > My heat muff is held in place on the exhaust with 2 hose clamps but > there are many possibilities for incoming air to escape into the > lower cowl. Is high temp RTV suitable for closing up all possible > air escape routes around the heat muff? Or is there a better solution. > > Angier Ames -- Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, DynaComm, Corp. 248-345-0500, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.ws LNC2, FB90/92, O-320-D1F, 1,300 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan --Apple-Mail-1-733037888 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
I packed my heat muff with stainless steel Brillo pads. I believe = that this should help to absorb as much of the heat as can be from the = exhaust pipe. I have also rapped the Heat muff (under the clamps) = with=A0asbestos=A0equivalent=A0tape. I keep the #1=A0exhaust=A0gas probe = away from the clamp with RTV. I have been running this setup for about 3 = years without a problem.

Our heat rap is used for = both the carb (if you have one) heat and the cabin heat. RVs use 2 heat = muffs. I think that that would be a better setup. On my trip from = Detroit to Norfolk yesterday I flew at 11,500 ft with a carb temp of -6. = I could only raise the temp to +2. If my carb had iced, I could have had = a problem.

If = anyone knows, I would like to know what the temperature rise is on a = production plane. I have had an A&P tell me that the temperature = should go up by 20 or 30 degrees. I flew in a Tiger with a carb temp = probe and only saw the temperature go up about 10 degrees. Can anyone = out there tell me how far other carb temp gauges raise?

From: "Greenbacks, UnLtd." <N4ZQ@comcast.net>

My heat muff is held in place on the exhaust with 2 hose clamps = but there are many possibilities for incoming air to escape into the = lower cowl. Is high temp RTV suitable for closing up all possible air = escape routes around the heat muff? Or is there a better = solution.

Angier Ames
=

Lorn H. = 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, DynaComm, = Corp.
248-345-0500, = mailto:lorn@dynacomm.ws=
LNC2, = FB90/92, O-320-D1F, 1,300 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE = Michigan

=

= --Apple-Mail-1-733037888--