X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 19:04:24 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.12.136.170] (HELO imo-m11.mail.aol.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2454048 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 14:34:23 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.136.170; envelope-from=GilliamDL@aol.com Received: from GilliamDL@aol.com by imo-m11.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id q.c54.1d00acd9 (52331) for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2007 14:33:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DavePC (pool-71-117-232-246.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.232.246]) by ciaaol-d04.mail.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILCIAAOLD049-cc6b472cbf04164; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 14:33:42 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: Reply-To: "DaveG" From: "DaveG" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Movie X-Original-Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 11:33:45 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 X-AOL-IP: 71.117.232.246 X-Spam-Flag: NO Gotta go with Tom Gourley on this one. I can see ZERO POSITIVE PUBLIC PERCEPTION of home built, experimental, EAA, private flyers, pilot attitudes, etc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Gourley" To: Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 7:06 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Movie > Yes, I am a little paranoid. I guess that's because the general public > (those not knowledgeable about flying), bureaucrats and politicians, and > in particular the media seem to delight in leaping to totally illogical, > and inaccurate, conclusions about the dangers of "small" airplanes and > their irresponsible pilots any time there is any sort of incident or > perceived threat no matter how irrational that perception may be. > Attempts at educating these folks are usually doomed to failure because, > for the most part, they have no interest in being educated. They're much > happier believing what they please (my mind's made up; don't confuse me > with facts) or what they're told by the talking heads on TV and the > Internet. Consequently I don't like to offer up any additional reasons to > fuel their delusions. There are a lot more of them than there are of us. > > Over 800 people die every week in the US in automobile accidents but it's > rare for one of those accidents to make the national news. (How many have > you seen on CNN lately?) A GA aircraft fatality frequently shows up in > the national news and it's not uncommon for one to generate rumblings > about increasing the restrictions on where and how we fly. Over 40,000 > traffic deaths per year cause no such reaction. For the majority of > people cars are a big part of everyday life, and a major piece of our > economy, and no one wants to have their driving privileges tampered with. > That same majority couldn't care less if we're allowed to fly or not. > Like it or not we're a very small minority but what we do is highly > visible. > > Back to the movie. Yes, it looks like there is some really neat flying in > the movie and I would like to see that part. It's the rest of the plot, > at least the way it's presented in the trailer, that I'm not crazy about. > > Tom Gourley > > > > -- > For archives and unsub > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html >