Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:01:24 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2367166@logan.com>
Received-SPF: neutral
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=63.240.77.81; envelope-from=glong2@netzero.net
From: "eugene long" <glong2@netzero.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] panel question
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <list-2363214@logan.com>
Thread-Index: AcgEnjiKjuk7dPU1R2CBt+GL3ydDCgAyyGbA

John:

I would put the Tru Track as high in the panel as possible. It is easier to
see and is used in most flights. 

PS  Mine is low and I wish it was much higher!

Eugene Long
Super ES

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of John
Barrett
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 8:45 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] panel question

I am finalizing the setup of my instrument panel -- LIVP.  Gary Wirrell of
Aerotronics wants to know if I prefer the Tru Trak AP on the bottom of the
stack as in the attached picture or have the transponder (one position up)
swap places so that the Tru Trak is one position up.  

Does anyone have a personal preference for this?  Theoretically I will be
letting my fingers do the walking on the AP controls more frequently than
the TXPDR.  Am looking for advice and rationale.

Regards,

John Barrett, CEO
Barrett/Garrett Enterprises, Inc.
PO Box 428
Port Hadlock, WA 98339
www.carbinge.com
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.33/1032 - Release Date: 9/27/2007
12:00 AM