In a message dated 9/30/2007 2:42:22 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
elippse@sbcglobal.net writes:
I use 1.45 sq.ft. "eqivalent parasite drag area",
CD=1, not to be confused with "flat plate area", CD=1.28, in my
equations for my 235. I calculate induced loss separately, since this depends
on air density and gross weight. The combo usually comes out to about
1.55-1.65.
Paul,
Thanks. Here is an interesting thought series.
What does the prop add when rotating at cruise pitch?
How about the gear, if extended at 120 KIAS?
What about the coefficient of a C172 with its struts, rivet heads, wheels,
etc?
What about its prop?
The reason for this line is that I believe that a "slick" airplane is more
adversely affected by non-seizure engine failure with a rotating cruise
prop than an already draggy commercially built spam can.
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL
(KARR)
Darwinian culling phrase: Watch
This!