Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #44124
From: Gary Casey <glcasey@adelphia.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: 360 engine baffling installation- Lack of Power
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:55:57 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Grayhawk,
Yes, I neglected to bring in humidity into the calculation, but the reason was that for normal flying it probably represents a small error.  For instance, most of the cruise flight temperatures are probably at 60F or lower.  Saturated conditions (100% relative humidity, or a dew point of 60) imply that water vapor takes up 1.7% of the air, so it would reduce power by that amount.  Its effect on density altitude is less than that since its density is a little more than half that of air so it would reduce density by about 0.8%.  Given all the other approximations I was using I felt that humidity could be left out.  That would not be true for a takeoff at 100F under very humid conditions when water vapor could make up 6% of the air.
Gary


Gary,
 
Try this calculator and see what the dew point does to % power.
 
 
Grayhawk
 
PS:  I have an inexpensive instrument that I stick into the cabin air inlet in flight to measure the dew point or % humidity.  Temperature isn't enough.
 
PPS: The sq rt of .75 is .866.  86.6% of 30" is 26" and 86.6% of 2700 is 2300.  But since I fly at 2500 rpm, using your adjustment, then a MAP of 24" would approximate 75% power.  Since I also like to fly at WOT and anytime I see a MAP that low, I must be at or below 75% power.  Normally that would be at or above 6500 MSL.  Since I also use ram air induction at around 175 KIAS at that altitude, I have to go up another 1000 feet and fly in the opposite direction (towards O'Hare) in order to conduct the GAMI lean test.  Bummer.



Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster