Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #43816
From: Brent Regan <brent@regandesigns.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Cool Fuel Fool
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:02:05 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
The question came up the other day as to what happens to fuel , specifically Jet-A, when it gets really cold. There has been some debate as to if some recent turbine flameouts have been due to an increase in viscosity due to the low temperatures at altitude followed by a high demand during landing. Given that "one test is worth a thousand expert opinions" I procured some Jet-A and performed a test using one of the environmental chambers in our testing lab.

I used a one liter beaker with about 700 CC of Jet-A, a thermocouple probe, a painters viscosity cup, a stop watch and the thermal chamber. For comparison I also tested some Red Tractor Diesel (used by farm equipment  since it is sold without road tax).  Viscosity was measured by dipping the cup in the fuel then measuring the time it takes to run out a hole in the bottom.

The results are as follows. Temperatures are in Celsius and time is in seconds.

Temp Jet-A Red
+26.5 15.6 15.8
-30.1 16.2 17.4
-34.2 16.4 20.5
-38.3 16.8 23.5
-46.0 16.9 27.7
-55.0 26.0 51.0
-69.0 Solid Solid


It was interesting to note that the Jet-A maintained a consistent viscosity  down to a temperature you would expect to find at the tropopause (~-50 - 55C). Due to RVSM limitations it is unlikely that any homebuilt will be routinely operated above FL270 where IACO puts the temperature at  -38.4C.  You would need a IACO -18C day  at that altitude and enough time to cold soak the fuel before viscosity became an issue.

Temperature had a much larger effect on the Red Tractor Diesel. I suspect that this is because the diesel is a much broader fraction of the distillate.

The best part of the experiment was freezing the fuel. As you can see in the pictures the Jet-A turns into a gelatinous Vaseline like solid. In one of my less than brilliant "licking the flagpole" moments I touched the surface of the frozen fuel, forgetting just how cold -69C (-92F) is. Within a second the tissue on the tip of my finger was frozen white and hurt like hell.  Fortunately the years of jousting with fellow engineers has given me a thick skin so no permanent damage was done. As punishment I had to say the subject line of this post 5 times without error.

One other observation was that atmospheric moisture would condense and freeze on the surface of the fuel. I could imagine that the warm wet air entering a vent line during decent  could condense on the interior surfaces of the tank. A good reminder to check those sumps often!

The test suggests that for operations below FL270, fuel system flow tests at ambient temperature are sufficient to qualify the delivery rate of the system. If an alternate fuel is considered (e.g. Red Diesel, Bio-Diesel, fry oil etc.)  then additional flow capacity would likely be needed.  For example, the time required to drain a tank  (fuel bay) of Red Diesel at -38C is roughly 80% longer than at +26C so the fuel system would need to be designed accordingly.

Regards
Brent Regan

Image
DSCF3118.JPG
Image
DSCF3119.JPG
Image
DSCF3120.JPG
Image
Jet-A Viscosity.jpg
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster