X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:08:12 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) with ESMTP id 2284880 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 22:11:01 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.67; envelope-from=rtitsworth@mindspring.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=EdK619jH8N+ds1LzBC7QemuLdBCsZbJUby/UqmnLqQE+QSZutmy9gOleYqnuuglb; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [71.238.59.21] (helo=RDTVAIO) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1IP7a5-0005cH-JY for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 22:10:25 -0400 From: "rtitsworth" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] ES engine mount cracks and breaks X-Original-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 22:10:14 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <003101c7e786$3eb742e0$6600a8c0@RDTVAIO> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0032_01C7E764.B7A5A2E0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcfnX/dI2Lp5An0YSIyjHVn4CZNg1QAI6FgA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-ELNK-Trace: b17f11247b2ac8f0a79dc4b33984cbaa0a9da525759e2654bd29d278a1e4c1f5ade563ba14320870f83aa984341be17f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.238.59.21 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C7E764.B7A5A2E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Note, to all the IV guys (who may be unfamiliar with the ES): I believe the ES and IV & IVP engine mounts were virtually the same until very recently. So, the message/point should perhaps be directed to the IV drivers as well. Historically, only the drag link and a tab for attaching the retract cylinder were different (Redmond could verify). In the past couple years the newer ES mounts have an added stiffener over the strut. Rick _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Jim Nordin Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 5:36 PM Here's a note from Lon Kelley regarding his ES motor mount issues. I hope these pictures will encourage you all to examine closely . very closely . your motor mount.(snip) No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.6/971 - Release Date: 8/24/2007 2:59 PM ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C7E764.B7A5A2E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Note, to all the IV guys (who may = be unfamiliar with the ES):

 

I believe the ES and IV & IVP = engine mounts were virtually the same until very recently.  So, the = message/point should perhaps be directed to the IV drivers as = well.

Historically, only the drag link = and a tab for attaching the retract cylinder were different (Redmond could verify).  In the = past couple years the newer ES mounts have an added stiffener over the = strut.

Rick

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Jim = Nordin
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 5:36 PM

Here’s a note from Lon Kelley regarding his ES motor mount issues. I hope these pictures will = encourage you all to examine closely … very closely … your motor = mount…(snip) =


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.6/971 - Release Date: = 8/24/2007 2:59 PM

------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C7E764.B7A5A2E0--