Tim’s note answers my questions.
Private comments I’ve seen backs up Tim’s assertion the product is
supported to a degree that warrants praise. Doing the math says 5%- 7.5% of the
shocks fail for various reasons mostly due to hard landings. We don’t
have data that indicates the number of landings experienced for these failures
however. That information could help evaluate other statistical conclusions. However,
Scott K testifies 699 landings and miles of taxiing on less than ideal surfaces
without problems … real evidence of a good product.
Tim’s straight forward answer and user
testimony is enough for me.
I’ll use Tim’s debongers …
and maybe carry a donut set too.
Thank you Tim.
Jim Nordin
From: Lancair Mailing
List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf
Of Timothy Ong
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007
6:40 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] TK5 shocks...the
rest of the story
Hi Guys,
Sorry I’ve been real busy, but I’ve had a chance
to look over the posts to the LML about the TK5 shocks.
Indeed, if the shock has completely failed, it would not be
advisable to fly except with the gear down. You will not hurt the shock
deflated, but there is the good possibility that the gear will not retract
properly.
To date there has been over 400 sets sold to Lancair 235,
320, 360 aircraft owners (I’m trying to round up the exact number).
This is probably over half the entire flying fleet. Of the failures
(approximately 20-30) most were due to hard landings (this is an
understatement) at which the aircraft should have been grounded anyway for a
thorough inspection.
There also have been a couple initial failures to
installation errors on my part of seals and are defective components (mostly
schraders). These type failures typically fail immediately upon
installation. Interestingly enough I dyno test each shock, but for some
reason the test does not pick up these failures (still scratching my head on
this one).
I have a one year warranty that covers any manufacturing
defects whatsoever. I have actually warranted shocks that are much older
do to the fact they had just begun their flight testing.
In the past, if the aircraft has been AOG and not at its
home airport, I have FEDEX’d overnight a replacement shock to get the
aircraft home and sorted it out later.
I have and always will stand behind my products that I
design. The TK5 shock has definitely been proven in the market. At
only 1.15 lbs, it is definitely the lightest alternative to the donuts.
As far as Chris Z’s comment that basically only good
things are said on the LML about the TK5 shocks because I work for Lancair and
that would be burning a big bridge…..obviously Chris doesn’t know
me very well at all.
If I’ve missed answering any of the pertinent
questions, please let me know and, I’ll try again.
Regards,
Timothy Ong